We use cookies to offer you an optimal experience on our website. By browsing our website, you accept the use of cookies.
Filter by
Specialty
View more
Technologies
View more
Clear filter Media type
View more
Clear filter Category
View more
Publication date
Sort by:
Laparoscopic left lymphadenectomy (L-LND) for non-seminomatous testis tumors
This video demonstrates a laparoscopic technique for the treatment of clinical stage I non-seminomatous testicular germ cell tumors (NSGCT). Dissection could be reproduced laparoscopically at our urology center. The laparoscopic approach is a tool used for pathologic lymph node staging and laparoscopy has provided well-known and proven benefits (mean of hospital stay and bleeding), including minor intraoperative and postoperative complications. Currently, there are several options for clinical stage I NSGCT: surveillance, primary chemotherapy, open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) and laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (L-RPLND), and treatment will depend on some parameters such as histology, tumor markers, lymphovascular invasion, and in case surgery is decided upon, the patient’s preference goes to the procedure.

References
1. Valero Fuentealba G. [Antegrade ejaculation alter modified lumboaortic laparoscopic lymphadenectomy]. Arch Esp Urol 2008;61:517-20.

2. Castillo OA, Sánchez-Salas R, Secin FP, Campero JM, Foneron A, Vidal-Mora I. Linfadenectomía retroperitoneal laparoscópica primaria para el tumor testicular de células germinales no seminomatoso en estadio clínico I. Actas Urol Esp 2011;35:22-8.
3. Donohue JP, Thornhill JA, Foster RS, Rowland RG, Bihrle R. Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in clinical stage A non-seminomatous germ cell testis cancer. Review of the Indiana University experience 1965-1989. Br J Urol 1993;71:326-35.
4. Yoon GH, Stein JP, Skinner DG. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in the treatment of low-stage nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testicle: an update. Urol Oncol 2005;23:168-77.

5. Carver BS, Sheinfeld J. The current status of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for non-seminomatous germ-cell tumors. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2005;2:330-5.

6. Albqami N, Janetschek G. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection in the management of clinical stage I and II testicular cancer. J Endourol 2005;19:683-92.

7. Nelson JB, Chen RN, Bishoff JT, Oh WK, Kantoff PW, Donehower RC, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Urology 1999;54:1064-7.

8. Bhayani SB, Ong A, Oh WK, Kantoff PW, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer: a long-term update. Urology 2003;62:324-7.

9. Donohue JP, Zachary JM, Maynard BR. Distribution of nodal metastases in nonseminomatous testis cancer. J Urol 1982;128:315-20.

10. Weissbach L, Boedefeld EA. Localization of solitary and multiple metastases in stage II nonseminomatous testis tumor as basis for a modified staging lymph node dissection in stage I. J Urol 1987;138:77-82.

11. Höltl L, Peschel R, Knapp R, Janetschek G, Steiner H, Hittmair A, Rogatsch H, Bartsch G, Hobisch A. Primary lymphatic metastatic spread in testicular cancer occurs ventral to the lumbar vessels. Urology 2002;59:114-8.

12. Chang SS, Mohseni HF, Leon A, Sheinfeld J. Paracolic recurrence: the importance of wide excision of the spermatic cord at retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. J Urol 2002;167:94-6.

13. Beck SD, Cheng L, Bihrle R, Donohue JP, Foster RS. Does the presence of extranodal extension in pathological stage B1 nonseminomatous germ cell tumor necessitate adjuvant chemotherapy? J Urol 2007;177:944-6.

14. Richie JP. Clinical stage I testicular cancer: the role of modified retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. J Urol 1990;144:1160-3.

14. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Hobisch A, Bartsch G. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. J Endourol 2001;15:449-53.

15. Albqami N, Janetschek G. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection in the management of clinical stage I and II testicular cancer. J Endourol 2005;19:683-92.

16. Poulakis V, Skriapas K, de Vries R, Dillenburg W, Ferakis N, Witzsch U, Becht E. Quality of life after laparoscopic and open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in clinical Stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor: a comparison study. Urology 2006;68:154-60.

17. Abdel-Aziz KF, Anderson JK, Svatek R, Margulis V, Sagalowsky AI, Cadeddu JA. Laparoscopic and open retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ-cell testis tumors. J Endourol 2006;20:627-31.

18. Bhayani SB, Allaf ME, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic RPLND for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer: current status. Urol Oncol 2004;22:145-8.

19. Eggener SE, Carver BS, Sharp DS, Motzer RJ, Bosl GJ, Sheinfeld J. Incidence of disease outside modified retroperitoneal lymph node dissection templates in clinical stage I or IIA nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer. J Urol 2007;177:937-42.

20. Nielsen ME, Lima G, Schaeffer EM, Porter J, Cadeddu JA, Tuerk I, Kavoussi LR. Oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic RPLND in treatment of clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer. Urology 2007;70:1168-72.

21. Valdevenito Sepulveda JP, Merhe Nieva E, Valdevenito Sepulveda R, Cuevas Toro M, Gómez Gallo A, Bermúdez Luna H, Contreras Meléndez L, Gallegos Méndez I, Gallardo Escobar J. Palma Ceppi C. [Reduced retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for clinical stage I non seminomatous germ cell testicular cancer]. Arch Esp Urol 2007;60:245-54.

22. Neyer M, Peschel R, Akkad T, Springer-Stöhr B, Berger A, Bartsch G, Steiner H. Long-term results of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ-cell testicular cancer. J Endourol 2007;21:180-3.
JL Hoepffner, JB Roche, VE Corona Montes, T Piéchaud
Surgical intervention
6 years ago
3281 views
51 likes
0 comments
10:37
Laparoscopic left lymphadenectomy (L-LND) for non-seminomatous testis tumors
This video demonstrates a laparoscopic technique for the treatment of clinical stage I non-seminomatous testicular germ cell tumors (NSGCT). Dissection could be reproduced laparoscopically at our urology center. The laparoscopic approach is a tool used for pathologic lymph node staging and laparoscopy has provided well-known and proven benefits (mean of hospital stay and bleeding), including minor intraoperative and postoperative complications. Currently, there are several options for clinical stage I NSGCT: surveillance, primary chemotherapy, open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) and laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (L-RPLND), and treatment will depend on some parameters such as histology, tumor markers, lymphovascular invasion, and in case surgery is decided upon, the patient’s preference goes to the procedure.

References
1. Valero Fuentealba G. [Antegrade ejaculation alter modified lumboaortic laparoscopic lymphadenectomy]. Arch Esp Urol 2008;61:517-20.

2. Castillo OA, Sánchez-Salas R, Secin FP, Campero JM, Foneron A, Vidal-Mora I. Linfadenectomía retroperitoneal laparoscópica primaria para el tumor testicular de células germinales no seminomatoso en estadio clínico I. Actas Urol Esp 2011;35:22-8.
3. Donohue JP, Thornhill JA, Foster RS, Rowland RG, Bihrle R. Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in clinical stage A non-seminomatous germ cell testis cancer. Review of the Indiana University experience 1965-1989. Br J Urol 1993;71:326-35.
4. Yoon GH, Stein JP, Skinner DG. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in the treatment of low-stage nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testicle: an update. Urol Oncol 2005;23:168-77.

5. Carver BS, Sheinfeld J. The current status of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for non-seminomatous germ-cell tumors. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2005;2:330-5.

6. Albqami N, Janetschek G. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection in the management of clinical stage I and II testicular cancer. J Endourol 2005;19:683-92.

7. Nelson JB, Chen RN, Bishoff JT, Oh WK, Kantoff PW, Donehower RC, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Urology 1999;54:1064-7.

8. Bhayani SB, Ong A, Oh WK, Kantoff PW, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer: a long-term update. Urology 2003;62:324-7.

9. Donohue JP, Zachary JM, Maynard BR. Distribution of nodal metastases in nonseminomatous testis cancer. J Urol 1982;128:315-20.

10. Weissbach L, Boedefeld EA. Localization of solitary and multiple metastases in stage II nonseminomatous testis tumor as basis for a modified staging lymph node dissection in stage I. J Urol 1987;138:77-82.

11. Höltl L, Peschel R, Knapp R, Janetschek G, Steiner H, Hittmair A, Rogatsch H, Bartsch G, Hobisch A. Primary lymphatic metastatic spread in testicular cancer occurs ventral to the lumbar vessels. Urology 2002;59:114-8.

12. Chang SS, Mohseni HF, Leon A, Sheinfeld J. Paracolic recurrence: the importance of wide excision of the spermatic cord at retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. J Urol 2002;167:94-6.

13. Beck SD, Cheng L, Bihrle R, Donohue JP, Foster RS. Does the presence of extranodal extension in pathological stage B1 nonseminomatous germ cell tumor necessitate adjuvant chemotherapy? J Urol 2007;177:944-6.

14. Richie JP. Clinical stage I testicular cancer: the role of modified retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. J Urol 1990;144:1160-3.

14. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Hobisch A, Bartsch G. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. J Endourol 2001;15:449-53.

15. Albqami N, Janetschek G. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection in the management of clinical stage I and II testicular cancer. J Endourol 2005;19:683-92.

16. Poulakis V, Skriapas K, de Vries R, Dillenburg W, Ferakis N, Witzsch U, Becht E. Quality of life after laparoscopic and open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in clinical Stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor: a comparison study. Urology 2006;68:154-60.

17. Abdel-Aziz KF, Anderson JK, Svatek R, Margulis V, Sagalowsky AI, Cadeddu JA. Laparoscopic and open retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ-cell testis tumors. J Endourol 2006;20:627-31.

18. Bhayani SB, Allaf ME, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic RPLND for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer: current status. Urol Oncol 2004;22:145-8.

19. Eggener SE, Carver BS, Sharp DS, Motzer RJ, Bosl GJ, Sheinfeld J. Incidence of disease outside modified retroperitoneal lymph node dissection templates in clinical stage I or IIA nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer. J Urol 2007;177:937-42.

20. Nielsen ME, Lima G, Schaeffer EM, Porter J, Cadeddu JA, Tuerk I, Kavoussi LR. Oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic RPLND in treatment of clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer. Urology 2007;70:1168-72.

21. Valdevenito Sepulveda JP, Merhe Nieva E, Valdevenito Sepulveda R, Cuevas Toro M, Gómez Gallo A, Bermúdez Luna H, Contreras Meléndez L, Gallegos Méndez I, Gallardo Escobar J. Palma Ceppi C. [Reduced retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for clinical stage I non seminomatous germ cell testicular cancer]. Arch Esp Urol 2007;60:245-54.

22. Neyer M, Peschel R, Akkad T, Springer-Stöhr B, Berger A, Bartsch G, Steiner H. Long-term results of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ-cell testicular cancer. J Endourol 2007;21:180-3.
Robotic-assisted bladder neck reconstruction using the Goebell-Stoeckel technique and Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy
This video reports our experience with robotic bladder neck reconstruction using the Goebell Stoeckel technique and Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy.
It is the case of a 62-year-old woman who initially had her urinary stress incontinence treated with a suburethral sling that resulted in the migration of the prosthetic material in the urethra. After prosthesis removal, two attempts of suburethral slings and an attempt at balloon implantation also resulted in erosions and migration of the prosthetic material.
We recommend a continent derivation according to Mitrofanoff principles along with a suburethral autologous sling using Goebell Stoeckel technique.
The video demonstrates that this procedure is feasible and safe with encouraging results.
D Rey, R Mazloum, VE Corona Montes, T Piéchaud
Surgical intervention
6 years ago
1823 views
21 likes
0 comments
14:36
Robotic-assisted bladder neck reconstruction using the Goebell-Stoeckel technique and Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy
This video reports our experience with robotic bladder neck reconstruction using the Goebell Stoeckel technique and Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy.
It is the case of a 62-year-old woman who initially had her urinary stress incontinence treated with a suburethral sling that resulted in the migration of the prosthetic material in the urethra. After prosthesis removal, two attempts of suburethral slings and an attempt at balloon implantation also resulted in erosions and migration of the prosthetic material.
We recommend a continent derivation according to Mitrofanoff principles along with a suburethral autologous sling using Goebell Stoeckel technique.
The video demonstrates that this procedure is feasible and safe with encouraging results.
Laparoscopic augmentation enterocystoplasty and Mitrofanoff for neurogenic bladder
As a complementary video to the Mitrofanoff technique, we present the case of a patient with neurogenic bladder secondary to spina bifida. This video demonstrates augmentation ileocystoplasty complementary to Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy performed laparoscopically. Preoperative bowel preparation was not performed. Average operative time was 4.30 hours. This video shows that it is a safe, feasible and effective laparoscopic procedure with shorter recovery time and good cosmesis.

References:
1. Bagrodia A,Gargollo P. Robot-assisted bladder neck reconstruction, bladder neck sling, and appendicovesicostomy in children: description of technique and initial results. J Endourol 2011:25;8:1299-305.
2. Farrugia MK, Malone PS. Educational article: The Mitrofanoff procedure. J Pediatr Urol 2010;6:330-7.
3. Berkowitz J, North AC, Tripp R, Gearhart JP, Laksmanan Y. Mitrofanoff continent catheterizable conduits: top down or bottom up? J Pediatr Urol 2009;5:122-5.
4. Arango Rave ME, Lince Varela LF, Salazar Sanín C, Hoyos Figueroa FC, Hurtado SN, Rendón Isaza JC. [Outcomes the Mitrofanoff technique in the management of patients with neurogenic bladder: the experience in the San Vicente de Paul Universitary Hospital]. Actas Urol Esp 2009;33:69-75.
5. Gundeti MS, Eng MK, Reynolds WS, Zagaja GP. Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty and Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy: complete intracorporeal--initial case report. Urology 2008;72:1144-7.
6. Thakre AA, Yeung CK, Peters C. Robot-assisted Mitrofanoff and Malone antegrade continence enema reconstruction using divided appendix. J Endourol 2008;22:2393-6.
7. Sahadevan K, Pickard RS, Neal DE, Hasan TS. Is continent diversion using the Mitrofanoff principle a viable long-term option for adults requiring bladder replacement? BJU Int 2008;102:236-40.
8. Lendvay TS, Shnorhavorian M, Grady RW. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy and antegrade continent enema colon tube creation in a pediatric spina bifida patient. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2008;18:310-2.
9. Mhiri MN, Bahloul A, Chabchoub K. [Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy in children: indication and results]. Prog Urol 2007;17:245-9.
10. Leslie JA, Dussinger AM, Meldrum KK. Creation of continence mechanisms (Mitrofanoff) without appendix: the Monti and spiral Monti procedures. Urol Oncol 2007;25:148-53.
11. Basavaraj DR, Harrison SC. The Mitrofanoff procedure in the management of intractable incontinence: a critical appraisal. Curr Opin Urol 2006;16:244-7.
12. Wille MA, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL, Gundeti MS. Continence outcomes in patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy. J Urol 2011;185:1438-43.
13. Wille MA,Jayram G,Gundeti MS Feasibility and early outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic Mitrofanoffappendicovesicostomy in patients with prune belly syndrome BJU Int 2012;109:1:125-9.
14. Gundeti MS, Acharya SS, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL. Paediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty and Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy (RALIMA): feasibility of and initial experience with the University of Chicago technique. BJU Int 2011;107:962-9.
15. Chabchoub K, Ketata H, Fakhfakh H, Bahloul A, Mhiri MN. [Continent urinary diversion (Mitrofanoff principle). Physical mechanisms and urodynamic explanation of continence]. Prog Urol 2008;18:120-4.
16. Karsenty G, Chartier-Kastler E, Mozer P, Even-Schneider A, Denys P, Richard F. A novel technique to achieve cutaneous continent urinary diversion in spinal cord-injured patients unable to catheterize through native urethra. Spinal Cord 2008;46:305-10.
17. Nguyen HT, Passerotti CC, Penna FJ, Retik AB, Peters CA. Robotic assisted laparoscopic Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy: preliminary experience in a pediatric population. J Urol 2009;182:1528-34.
18. Vian E, Soustelle L, Viale S, Costa P. [A technique of continent vesicostomy with ileocystoplasty: study of 32 patients]. Prog Urol 2009;19:116-21.
19. Hsu TH, Shortliffe LD. Laparoscopic Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy. Urology 2004;64:802-4.
D Rey, VE Corona Montes, T Piéchaud
Surgical intervention
7 years ago
2019 views
32 likes
0 comments
09:45
Laparoscopic augmentation enterocystoplasty and Mitrofanoff for neurogenic bladder
As a complementary video to the Mitrofanoff technique, we present the case of a patient with neurogenic bladder secondary to spina bifida. This video demonstrates augmentation ileocystoplasty complementary to Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy performed laparoscopically. Preoperative bowel preparation was not performed. Average operative time was 4.30 hours. This video shows that it is a safe, feasible and effective laparoscopic procedure with shorter recovery time and good cosmesis.

References:
1. Bagrodia A,Gargollo P. Robot-assisted bladder neck reconstruction, bladder neck sling, and appendicovesicostomy in children: description of technique and initial results. J Endourol 2011:25;8:1299-305.
2. Farrugia MK, Malone PS. Educational article: The Mitrofanoff procedure. J Pediatr Urol 2010;6:330-7.
3. Berkowitz J, North AC, Tripp R, Gearhart JP, Laksmanan Y. Mitrofanoff continent catheterizable conduits: top down or bottom up? J Pediatr Urol 2009;5:122-5.
4. Arango Rave ME, Lince Varela LF, Salazar Sanín C, Hoyos Figueroa FC, Hurtado SN, Rendón Isaza JC. [Outcomes the Mitrofanoff technique in the management of patients with neurogenic bladder: the experience in the San Vicente de Paul Universitary Hospital]. Actas Urol Esp 2009;33:69-75.
5. Gundeti MS, Eng MK, Reynolds WS, Zagaja GP. Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty and Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy: complete intracorporeal--initial case report. Urology 2008;72:1144-7.
6. Thakre AA, Yeung CK, Peters C. Robot-assisted Mitrofanoff and Malone antegrade continence enema reconstruction using divided appendix. J Endourol 2008;22:2393-6.
7. Sahadevan K, Pickard RS, Neal DE, Hasan TS. Is continent diversion using the Mitrofanoff principle a viable long-term option for adults requiring bladder replacement? BJU Int 2008;102:236-40.
8. Lendvay TS, Shnorhavorian M, Grady RW. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy and antegrade continent enema colon tube creation in a pediatric spina bifida patient. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2008;18:310-2.
9. Mhiri MN, Bahloul A, Chabchoub K. [Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy in children: indication and results]. Prog Urol 2007;17:245-9.
10. Leslie JA, Dussinger AM, Meldrum KK. Creation of continence mechanisms (Mitrofanoff) without appendix: the Monti and spiral Monti procedures. Urol Oncol 2007;25:148-53.
11. Basavaraj DR, Harrison SC. The Mitrofanoff procedure in the management of intractable incontinence: a critical appraisal. Curr Opin Urol 2006;16:244-7.
12. Wille MA, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL, Gundeti MS. Continence outcomes in patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy. J Urol 2011;185:1438-43.
13. Wille MA,Jayram G,Gundeti MS Feasibility and early outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic Mitrofanoffappendicovesicostomy in patients with prune belly syndrome BJU Int 2012;109:1:125-9.
14. Gundeti MS, Acharya SS, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL. Paediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty and Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy (RALIMA): feasibility of and initial experience with the University of Chicago technique. BJU Int 2011;107:962-9.
15. Chabchoub K, Ketata H, Fakhfakh H, Bahloul A, Mhiri MN. [Continent urinary diversion (Mitrofanoff principle). Physical mechanisms and urodynamic explanation of continence]. Prog Urol 2008;18:120-4.
16. Karsenty G, Chartier-Kastler E, Mozer P, Even-Schneider A, Denys P, Richard F. A novel technique to achieve cutaneous continent urinary diversion in spinal cord-injured patients unable to catheterize through native urethra. Spinal Cord 2008;46:305-10.
17. Nguyen HT, Passerotti CC, Penna FJ, Retik AB, Peters CA. Robotic assisted laparoscopic Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy: preliminary experience in a pediatric population. J Urol 2009;182:1528-34.
18. Vian E, Soustelle L, Viale S, Costa P. [A technique of continent vesicostomy with ileocystoplasty: study of 32 patients]. Prog Urol 2009;19:116-21.
19. Hsu TH, Shortliffe LD. Laparoscopic Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy. Urology 2004;64:802-4.
Robot-assisted cystoprostatectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion using a Hautmann technique
It is the case of a 62-year-old man diagnosed with a T2bN0M0 transitional cell adenocarcinoma, which was evidenced by pathological findings after resection of a bladder tumor.
Seven ports are required prior to the installation of the DaVinci® robotic system:
- 12mm port on superior border of umbilicus.
- Right robotic port at the midline between anterior superior iliac spine and umbilicus. - Two 5mm ports on both sides of right robotic port.
- Additional 12mm port between the two 5mm ports once dissection of bladder pedicles has been started.
- Two left robotic ports in left iliac fossa and anterior axillary line.
This video demonstrates the cystoprostatectomy technique with a W-pouch intracorporeal neobladder (Hautmann ileal neobladder), which is feasible in specialized centers.
References:
1. Kaufman DS, Shipley WU, Feldman AS. Bladder cancer. Lancet 2009;374(9685):239-49.
2. Lee DJ, Rothberg MB, McKiernan JM, Benson MC, Badani KK. Robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy in complex surgical patients: single institution report. Can J Urol 2009;16(3):4664-9.
3. Tunuguntla HS, Nieder AM, Manoharan M. Neobladder reconstruction following radical cystoprostatectomy for invasive bladder cancer. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2009;61(1):41-54.
4. Barocas DA, Patel SG, Chang SS, Clark PE, Smith JA Jr, Cookson MS. Outcomes of patients undergoing radical cystroprostatectomy for bladder cancer with prostatic involvement on final pathology. BJU Int 2009;104(8):1091-7.
5. Pruthi RS, Stefaniak H, Hubbard JS, Wallen EM. Robotic anterior pelvic exenteration for bladder cancer in the female: outcomes and comparisons to their male counterparts. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009;19(1):23-7.
6. Kefer JC, Campbell SC. Current status of prostate-sparing cystectomy. Urol Oncol 2008;26(5):486-93.
7. Rawal S, Raghunath SK, Khanna S, Jain D, Kaul R, Kumar P, Chhabra R, Brushan K. Minilaparotomy radical cystoprostatectomy (Minilap RCP) in the surgical management of urinary bladder carcinoma: early experience. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2008;38(9):611-6.
8. Park SY, Cho KS, Ham WS, Choi HM, Hong SJ, Rha KH. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion: initial experience in Korea. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2008;18(3):401-4.
9. Gregori A, Galli S, Goumas I, Scieri F, Stener S, Gaboardi F. A cost comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical cystoprostatectomy and orthotopic ileal neobladder at a single institution. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2007;79(3):127-9.
10. Young JL, Finley DS, Ornstein DD. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic cystoprostatectomy for prostatic carcinosarcoma. JSLS 2007;11(1)109-
12.
11. Nuñez-Mora C, Cabrera P, Garcia-Mediero JM, de Fata FR, Gonzalez J, Angulo J. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy and orthotopic urinary diversion in the malepatient: technique. Arch Esp Urol 2011;64(3):195-206.
12. Rehman J, Sangalli MN, Guru K, de Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Carpentier P, Mottrie A. Total intracorporeal robot-assisted laparoscopic ileal conduit (Bricker) urinary diversion: technique and outcomes. Can J Urol 2011;18(1):5548-56.
13. Canda AE, Asil E, Balbay MD. An unexpected resident in the ileum detected during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy and intracorporeal Studer pouch formation: Taenia saginata parasite. J Endourol 2011;25(2):301-3.
14. Lin T, Huang J, Han J, Xu K, Huang H, Jiang C, Liu H, Zhang C, Yao Y, Xie W, Shah AK, Huang L. Hybrid laparoscopic endoscopic single-site surgery for radical cystoprostatectomy and orthotopic ileal neobladder: an initial experience of 12 cases. J Endourol 2011;25(1):57-63.
15. Josephson DY, Chen JA, Chan KG, Lau CS, Nelson RA, Wilson TG. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy and extracorporeal continent urinary diversion: highlight of surgical techniques and outcomes. Int J Med Robot 2010;6(3):315-23.
16. Kasraeian A, Barret E, Cathelineau X, Rozet F, Galiano M, Sánchez-Salas R, Vallancien G. Robot-assisted laparoscopic cystoprostatectomy with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy, extracorporeal enterocystoplasty, and intracorporeal enterourethral anastomosis: initial Montsouris Experience. J Endourol 2010;24(3):409-13.
17. Varinot J, Camparo P, Roupret M, Bitker MO, Capron F, Cussenot O, Witjes JA, Compérat E. Full analysis of the prostatic urethra at the time of radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer: impact on final disease stage. Virchows Arch 2009;455(5):449-53.
18. Palou Redorta J, Gaya Sopena JM, Gausa Gascon K, Sanchez-Martin F, Rosales Bordes A, Rodriguez Faba O, Villavicencio Mavrich H. Robotic radical cystoprostatectomy: oncological and functional analysis. Actas Urol Esp 2009;33(7):759-66.
D Rey, VE Corona Montes, T Piéchaud
Surgical intervention
7 years ago
4877 views
100 likes
0 comments
10:22
Robot-assisted cystoprostatectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion using a Hautmann technique
It is the case of a 62-year-old man diagnosed with a T2bN0M0 transitional cell adenocarcinoma, which was evidenced by pathological findings after resection of a bladder tumor.
Seven ports are required prior to the installation of the DaVinci® robotic system:
- 12mm port on superior border of umbilicus.
- Right robotic port at the midline between anterior superior iliac spine and umbilicus. - Two 5mm ports on both sides of right robotic port.
- Additional 12mm port between the two 5mm ports once dissection of bladder pedicles has been started.
- Two left robotic ports in left iliac fossa and anterior axillary line.
This video demonstrates the cystoprostatectomy technique with a W-pouch intracorporeal neobladder (Hautmann ileal neobladder), which is feasible in specialized centers.
References:
1. Kaufman DS, Shipley WU, Feldman AS. Bladder cancer. Lancet 2009;374(9685):239-49.
2. Lee DJ, Rothberg MB, McKiernan JM, Benson MC, Badani KK. Robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy in complex surgical patients: single institution report. Can J Urol 2009;16(3):4664-9.
3. Tunuguntla HS, Nieder AM, Manoharan M. Neobladder reconstruction following radical cystoprostatectomy for invasive bladder cancer. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2009;61(1):41-54.
4. Barocas DA, Patel SG, Chang SS, Clark PE, Smith JA Jr, Cookson MS. Outcomes of patients undergoing radical cystroprostatectomy for bladder cancer with prostatic involvement on final pathology. BJU Int 2009;104(8):1091-7.
5. Pruthi RS, Stefaniak H, Hubbard JS, Wallen EM. Robotic anterior pelvic exenteration for bladder cancer in the female: outcomes and comparisons to their male counterparts. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009;19(1):23-7.
6. Kefer JC, Campbell SC. Current status of prostate-sparing cystectomy. Urol Oncol 2008;26(5):486-93.
7. Rawal S, Raghunath SK, Khanna S, Jain D, Kaul R, Kumar P, Chhabra R, Brushan K. Minilaparotomy radical cystoprostatectomy (Minilap RCP) in the surgical management of urinary bladder carcinoma: early experience. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2008;38(9):611-6.
8. Park SY, Cho KS, Ham WS, Choi HM, Hong SJ, Rha KH. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion: initial experience in Korea. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2008;18(3):401-4.
9. Gregori A, Galli S, Goumas I, Scieri F, Stener S, Gaboardi F. A cost comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical cystoprostatectomy and orthotopic ileal neobladder at a single institution. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2007;79(3):127-9.
10. Young JL, Finley DS, Ornstein DD. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic cystoprostatectomy for prostatic carcinosarcoma. JSLS 2007;11(1)109-
12.
11. Nuñez-Mora C, Cabrera P, Garcia-Mediero JM, de Fata FR, Gonzalez J, Angulo J. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy and orthotopic urinary diversion in the malepatient: technique. Arch Esp Urol 2011;64(3):195-206.
12. Rehman J, Sangalli MN, Guru K, de Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Carpentier P, Mottrie A. Total intracorporeal robot-assisted laparoscopic ileal conduit (Bricker) urinary diversion: technique and outcomes. Can J Urol 2011;18(1):5548-56.
13. Canda AE, Asil E, Balbay MD. An unexpected resident in the ileum detected during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy and intracorporeal Studer pouch formation: Taenia saginata parasite. J Endourol 2011;25(2):301-3.
14. Lin T, Huang J, Han J, Xu K, Huang H, Jiang C, Liu H, Zhang C, Yao Y, Xie W, Shah AK, Huang L. Hybrid laparoscopic endoscopic single-site surgery for radical cystoprostatectomy and orthotopic ileal neobladder: an initial experience of 12 cases. J Endourol 2011;25(1):57-63.
15. Josephson DY, Chen JA, Chan KG, Lau CS, Nelson RA, Wilson TG. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy and extracorporeal continent urinary diversion: highlight of surgical techniques and outcomes. Int J Med Robot 2010;6(3):315-23.
16. Kasraeian A, Barret E, Cathelineau X, Rozet F, Galiano M, Sánchez-Salas R, Vallancien G. Robot-assisted laparoscopic cystoprostatectomy with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy, extracorporeal enterocystoplasty, and intracorporeal enterourethral anastomosis: initial Montsouris Experience. J Endourol 2010;24(3):409-13.
17. Varinot J, Camparo P, Roupret M, Bitker MO, Capron F, Cussenot O, Witjes JA, Compérat E. Full analysis of the prostatic urethra at the time of radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer: impact on final disease stage. Virchows Arch 2009;455(5):449-53.
18. Palou Redorta J, Gaya Sopena JM, Gausa Gascon K, Sanchez-Martin F, Rosales Bordes A, Rodriguez Faba O, Villavicencio Mavrich H. Robotic radical cystoprostatectomy: oncological and functional analysis. Actas Urol Esp 2009;33(7):759-66.
Single incision right nephrectomy for severe hydrophrenosis in a transplanted patient
Laparoscopy is becoming the "gold standard" approach for nephrectomy when treating different benign and malignant diseases as well as for living donor transplantation.
During the last few months in both experimental and clinical settings, new techniques such as Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES™) and Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) or Single Port Laparoscopic Surgery (SPLS) have been attempted in order to reduce even more the surgical trauma in laparo-endoscopic procedures.
SPLS allows to perform different surgical procedures using the umbilicus as the only site to access the abdominal cavity and, by using special trocars and instruments, to perform the operation using the same techniques and principles of standard laparoscopic surgery.
The video describes our personal technique for totally single incision right nephrectomy for severe hydronephrosis in a patient who has undergone a kidney transplant a few years earlier.
A 62-year-old patient underwent a kidney transplant 5 years earlier due to a renal failure caused by a glomerular nephritis. The native kidneys were left in place.
Several admissions of patients presenting with recurrent sepsis were reported to the infectious disease department.
Recurrent sepsis was likely to be caused by the hydronephrosis induced by a large stone located in the middle part of the ureter.
The abdominal MRI showed the severe hydronephrosis of the native right kidney as well as a large stone.
A single incision nephrectomy was performed with no complications and the patient’s postoperative course was uneventful.
L Boni, G Dionigi, E Cassinotti, M Di Giuseppe, E Colombo, L Giavarini, SM Tenconi, F Cantore, M Tozzi, R Dionigi
Surgical intervention
9 years ago
3875 views
34 likes
0 comments
10:10
Single incision right nephrectomy for severe hydrophrenosis in a transplanted patient
Laparoscopy is becoming the "gold standard" approach for nephrectomy when treating different benign and malignant diseases as well as for living donor transplantation.
During the last few months in both experimental and clinical settings, new techniques such as Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES™) and Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) or Single Port Laparoscopic Surgery (SPLS) have been attempted in order to reduce even more the surgical trauma in laparo-endoscopic procedures.
SPLS allows to perform different surgical procedures using the umbilicus as the only site to access the abdominal cavity and, by using special trocars and instruments, to perform the operation using the same techniques and principles of standard laparoscopic surgery.
The video describes our personal technique for totally single incision right nephrectomy for severe hydronephrosis in a patient who has undergone a kidney transplant a few years earlier.
A 62-year-old patient underwent a kidney transplant 5 years earlier due to a renal failure caused by a glomerular nephritis. The native kidneys were left in place.
Several admissions of patients presenting with recurrent sepsis were reported to the infectious disease department.
Recurrent sepsis was likely to be caused by the hydronephrosis induced by a large stone located in the middle part of the ureter.
The abdominal MRI showed the severe hydronephrosis of the native right kidney as well as a large stone.
A single incision nephrectomy was performed with no complications and the patient’s postoperative course was uneventful.