We use cookies to offer you an optimal experience on our website. By browsing our website, you accept the use of cookies.
Filter by
Specialty
View more
Technologies
View more
Clear filter Media type
View more
Clear filter Category
View more
Publication date
Sort by:
Laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis with peritonitis
This is the case of a 37-year-old male patient who presented with abdominal pain and fever at 39.4°C. The work-up demonstrated important inflammation with leukocytes at 16,000 and CRP levels at 169. CT-scan confirmed an acute appendicitis with an appendicolith at the base. The appendix is probably perforated as the CT-scan also demonstrated a pneumoperitoneum. Laparoscopic appendectomy is decided upon. The operative set-up is standard with an optical port placed at the umbilicus, a port in the left iliac fossa, and a suprapubic port. Exposure, appendectomy with stapling of the appendicular base, and cleansing of the peritoneal cavity are thoroughly demonstrated.
M Ignat, D Mutter, J Marescaux
Surgical intervention
1 year ago
4287 views
474 likes
0 comments
05:03
Laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis with peritonitis
This is the case of a 37-year-old male patient who presented with abdominal pain and fever at 39.4°C. The work-up demonstrated important inflammation with leukocytes at 16,000 and CRP levels at 169. CT-scan confirmed an acute appendicitis with an appendicolith at the base. The appendix is probably perforated as the CT-scan also demonstrated a pneumoperitoneum. Laparoscopic appendectomy is decided upon. The operative set-up is standard with an optical port placed at the umbilicus, a port in the left iliac fossa, and a suprapubic port. Exposure, appendectomy with stapling of the appendicular base, and cleansing of the peritoneal cavity are thoroughly demonstrated.
Laparoscopic appendectomy for recurrent appendicitis after medical treatment
Appendectomy is the only curative treatment of appendicitis. However, the management of patients with an appendiceal mass or abscess can be temporarily managed medically with intravenous antibiotic therapy and/or percutaneous drainage. And yet, there are many controversies over the non-operative management of acute appendicitis. In 2015, Fair et al. used data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project to evaluate 30-day morbidity and mortality of intervention (laparoscopic and open appendectomy) at different time periods. A delay of operative intervention longer than 48 hours was associated with a doubling of complication rates. Elective appendectomy can be performed after 6 to 8 weeks later, which proves successful in the vast majority of patients.
This is the case of an 83-year-old man who presented with an acute appendicitis treated medically in another hospital. The patient had a past medical history of arterial hypertension, cardiomyopathy, previous cerebral ischemia, and rectal polyp. A delayed appendectomy was planned. However, before the procedure, a total colonoscopy was performed because of the history of polyps. This elderly patient was hospitalized for colonoscopy. At admission, he presented with fever, right iliac fossa tenderness, and a biological inflammatory syndrome. A CT-scan was performed. It showed a recurrent acute appendicitis without mass, with a 2cm abscess on the tip of the appendix. An appendectomy was performed in this case.
A D'Urso, D Mutter, J Marescaux
Surgical intervention
1 year ago
4164 views
339 likes
0 comments
05:00
Laparoscopic appendectomy for recurrent appendicitis after medical treatment
Appendectomy is the only curative treatment of appendicitis. However, the management of patients with an appendiceal mass or abscess can be temporarily managed medically with intravenous antibiotic therapy and/or percutaneous drainage. And yet, there are many controversies over the non-operative management of acute appendicitis. In 2015, Fair et al. used data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project to evaluate 30-day morbidity and mortality of intervention (laparoscopic and open appendectomy) at different time periods. A delay of operative intervention longer than 48 hours was associated with a doubling of complication rates. Elective appendectomy can be performed after 6 to 8 weeks later, which proves successful in the vast majority of patients.
This is the case of an 83-year-old man who presented with an acute appendicitis treated medically in another hospital. The patient had a past medical history of arterial hypertension, cardiomyopathy, previous cerebral ischemia, and rectal polyp. A delayed appendectomy was planned. However, before the procedure, a total colonoscopy was performed because of the history of polyps. This elderly patient was hospitalized for colonoscopy. At admission, he presented with fever, right iliac fossa tenderness, and a biological inflammatory syndrome. A CT-scan was performed. It showed a recurrent acute appendicitis without mass, with a 2cm abscess on the tip of the appendix. An appendectomy was performed in this case.
Laparoscopic appendectomy and fenestration of hemorrhagic ovarian cyst
This is the case of a 19-year-old female patient who was admitted to the emergency department for lower abdominal pain going on for 24 hours. No abdominal guarding was noted. Biological findings showed an inflammation with leukocytes at 16,000 and CRP levels at 112. CT-scan showed the presence of an enlarged appendix (9mm thick) along with a voluminous adnexal cyst, which may be suggestive of a tubo-ovarian abscess. Laparoscopic exploration is performed. Congestive appendicitis is confirmed, as well as the presence of a hemorrhagic right ovarian cyst. Laparoscopic appendectomy is performed and the hemorrhagic ovarian cyst is fenestrated.
M Ignat, D Mutter, J Marescaux
Surgical intervention
1 year ago
3796 views
409 likes
0 comments
04:57
Laparoscopic appendectomy and fenestration of hemorrhagic ovarian cyst
This is the case of a 19-year-old female patient who was admitted to the emergency department for lower abdominal pain going on for 24 hours. No abdominal guarding was noted. Biological findings showed an inflammation with leukocytes at 16,000 and CRP levels at 112. CT-scan showed the presence of an enlarged appendix (9mm thick) along with a voluminous adnexal cyst, which may be suggestive of a tubo-ovarian abscess. Laparoscopic exploration is performed. Congestive appendicitis is confirmed, as well as the presence of a hemorrhagic right ovarian cyst. Laparoscopic appendectomy is performed and the hemorrhagic ovarian cyst is fenestrated.
Laparoscopic appendectomy after appendicular phlegmon
Appendicitis is one of the main reasons for consultation and surgical interventions in the emergency departments around the world. If it is not diagnosed and treated timely, it can evolve towards an appendicular perforation, and as a result, it can become a peritonitis or an appendicular phlegmon. This latter case may occur in approximately 10% of cases.
Currently, the management of the appendicular phlegmon is controversial. Some authors prefer to perform an appendectomy immediately, and others are in favor of medical treatment using antibiotic therapy and percutaneous drainage if possible and delay appendectomy.
In this case, we present a patient presenting with an appendicular phlegmon in which a conservative management with percutaneous drainage and delayed surgery were decided upon.
P Saleg, A D'Urso, D Mutter, J Marescaux
Surgical intervention
2 years ago
8602 views
518 likes
0 comments
04:17
Laparoscopic appendectomy after appendicular phlegmon
Appendicitis is one of the main reasons for consultation and surgical interventions in the emergency departments around the world. If it is not diagnosed and treated timely, it can evolve towards an appendicular perforation, and as a result, it can become a peritonitis or an appendicular phlegmon. This latter case may occur in approximately 10% of cases.
Currently, the management of the appendicular phlegmon is controversial. Some authors prefer to perform an appendectomy immediately, and others are in favor of medical treatment using antibiotic therapy and percutaneous drainage if possible and delay appendectomy.
In this case, we present a patient presenting with an appendicular phlegmon in which a conservative management with percutaneous drainage and delayed surgery were decided upon.
Low-cost laparoscopic appendectomy: how to teach
Laparoscopic appendectomy must be the gold standard. Nowadays, many centers still continue to go on with McBurney’s incisions. Why? Expensive devices may be a reason. Low cost appendectomy allows for a diagnostic laparoscopy and offers a therapeutic option with the lowest price.
On the other hand, residents must begin the learning curve in laparoscopy as soon as possible not only with a training center (training in cadaveric or animals) but they must also start practicing on humans with watchful surgeon/teacher’s eyes.
The aim of this video is to demonstrate that low-cost laparoscopic appendectomy is feasible not only for surgeons but also for residents operating with an expert.
S Rua, G Machado , P Mira
Surgical intervention
3 years ago
9765 views
561 likes
0 comments
08:49
Low-cost laparoscopic appendectomy: how to teach
Laparoscopic appendectomy must be the gold standard. Nowadays, many centers still continue to go on with McBurney’s incisions. Why? Expensive devices may be a reason. Low cost appendectomy allows for a diagnostic laparoscopy and offers a therapeutic option with the lowest price.
On the other hand, residents must begin the learning curve in laparoscopy as soon as possible not only with a training center (training in cadaveric or animals) but they must also start practicing on humans with watchful surgeon/teacher’s eyes.
The aim of this video is to demonstrate that low-cost laparoscopic appendectomy is feasible not only for surgeons but also for residents operating with an expert.
Monopolar laparoscopic appendectomy
The laparoscopic approach is the gold standard for acute appendicitis. There are several surgical devices to achieve hemostatic control of the appendicular artery (monopolar electrocautery, endoclip, endostapler, ultrasonic scalpel, and LigaSure™ vessel-sealing device), which vary widely according to the surgeon’s preference and availability in the institution. All devices are effective and safe, but monopolar electrocautery systems are the most cost-effective ones.
A 24-year-old woman was admitted to our emergency department with a 24-hour evolution of right iliac fossa pain. No other symptoms were noted. An abdominal ultrasound was suggestive of an acute appendicitis.
This full length surgical movie shows the feasibility and safety of monopolar electrocautery for meso-appendiceal dissection. The intra-abdominal procedure was achieved in 5 minutes 30 seconds.
No complications were observed and the patient was discharged home on the next postoperative day.
P Leão, A Goulart
Surgical intervention
4 years ago
9678 views
332 likes
0 comments
06:14
Monopolar laparoscopic appendectomy
The laparoscopic approach is the gold standard for acute appendicitis. There are several surgical devices to achieve hemostatic control of the appendicular artery (monopolar electrocautery, endoclip, endostapler, ultrasonic scalpel, and LigaSure™ vessel-sealing device), which vary widely according to the surgeon’s preference and availability in the institution. All devices are effective and safe, but monopolar electrocautery systems are the most cost-effective ones.
A 24-year-old woman was admitted to our emergency department with a 24-hour evolution of right iliac fossa pain. No other symptoms were noted. An abdominal ultrasound was suggestive of an acute appendicitis.
This full length surgical movie shows the feasibility and safety of monopolar electrocautery for meso-appendiceal dissection. The intra-abdominal procedure was achieved in 5 minutes 30 seconds.
No complications were observed and the patient was discharged home on the next postoperative day.
Laparoscopic interval appendectomy after conservative treatment of an appendiceal abscess
Appendectomy is the standard treatment for acute appendicitis in adults and children. However, more and more studies demonstrate that a conservative treatment with antibiotics and radiological drainage, if required, is effective and may be of importance in complicated cases and in older frail patients [1].
In the absence of randomized controlled trials, there is no consensus on whether an appendectomy at distance from the acute phase (interval appendectomy) is necessary for conservatively treated patients. A large observational study has shown that about 10% of these patients will require an appendectomy [2] over a period of several years. However, a histopathological study of appendices removed during interval appendectomy after conservative management of pediatric patients with acute appendicitis with an inflammatory mass or abscess concluded that more than half of the patients had strong histopathological changes in the appendix, thereby suggesting a high possibility of recurrence [3].
This is the case of a 58-year-old female patient presenting with a perforated appendix with an appendiceal abscess, treated by antibiotherapy and radiological drainage. She has a past history of uterine cancer treated by radiochemotherapy and total hysterectomy, complicated by bilateral ureteral stenoses after radiotherapy, treated by long-term pig-tail urinary catheters, as well as a postoperative abdominal hernia treated by means of an abdominal underlay mesh. Even though the initial non-surgical treatment of her complicated acute appendicitis was successful, an interval appendectomy was indicated because of persistent abdominal pain in the right lower quadrant (RLQ). The operation was performed laparoscopically with a simple postoperative course.
References:
1. Tannoury J. Abboud B. Treatment options of inflammatory appendiceal masses in adults. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:3942-50.
2. McCutcheon BA, Chang DC, Marcus LP, Inui T, Noorbakhsh A, Schallhorn C, Parina R, Salazar FR, Talamini MA. Long-term outcomes of patients with nonsurgically managed uncomplicated appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 2014;218:905-13.
3. Otake S, Suzuki N, Takahashi A, Toki F, Nishi A, Yamamoto H, Kuroiwa M, Kuwano H. Histological analysis of appendices removed during interval appendectomy after conservative management of pediatric patients with acute appendicitis with an inflammatory mass or abscess. Surg Today 2014;44:1400-5.
D Ntourakis, D Mutter, J Marescaux
Surgical intervention
4 years ago
5310 views
168 likes
0 comments
12:12
Laparoscopic interval appendectomy after conservative treatment of an appendiceal abscess
Appendectomy is the standard treatment for acute appendicitis in adults and children. However, more and more studies demonstrate that a conservative treatment with antibiotics and radiological drainage, if required, is effective and may be of importance in complicated cases and in older frail patients [1].
In the absence of randomized controlled trials, there is no consensus on whether an appendectomy at distance from the acute phase (interval appendectomy) is necessary for conservatively treated patients. A large observational study has shown that about 10% of these patients will require an appendectomy [2] over a period of several years. However, a histopathological study of appendices removed during interval appendectomy after conservative management of pediatric patients with acute appendicitis with an inflammatory mass or abscess concluded that more than half of the patients had strong histopathological changes in the appendix, thereby suggesting a high possibility of recurrence [3].
This is the case of a 58-year-old female patient presenting with a perforated appendix with an appendiceal abscess, treated by antibiotherapy and radiological drainage. She has a past history of uterine cancer treated by radiochemotherapy and total hysterectomy, complicated by bilateral ureteral stenoses after radiotherapy, treated by long-term pig-tail urinary catheters, as well as a postoperative abdominal hernia treated by means of an abdominal underlay mesh. Even though the initial non-surgical treatment of her complicated acute appendicitis was successful, an interval appendectomy was indicated because of persistent abdominal pain in the right lower quadrant (RLQ). The operation was performed laparoscopically with a simple postoperative course.
References:
1. Tannoury J. Abboud B. Treatment options of inflammatory appendiceal masses in adults. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:3942-50.
2. McCutcheon BA, Chang DC, Marcus LP, Inui T, Noorbakhsh A, Schallhorn C, Parina R, Salazar FR, Talamini MA. Long-term outcomes of patients with nonsurgically managed uncomplicated appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 2014;218:905-13.
3. Otake S, Suzuki N, Takahashi A, Toki F, Nishi A, Yamamoto H, Kuroiwa M, Kuwano H. Histological analysis of appendices removed during interval appendectomy after conservative management of pediatric patients with acute appendicitis with an inflammatory mass or abscess. Surg Today 2014;44:1400-5.
Single port appendectomy using the EK glove port: a cost-effective innovation
Single port laparoscopic surgery has emerged to enhance the cosmetic benefits and to decrease morbidity in minimally invasive surgery. However, this technique requires a specialized multichannel port (to introduce the laparoscope and instruments) which is very costly and not affordable for the majority of the population. We have improvised a single port access system using readily available materials like surgical gloves, the rigid plastic ring, the inner flexible ring and conventional laparoscopic trocars (the EK Port) with no added cost for the patient. This also eliminates the need for an Alexis® wound retractor. We have performed about 130 single port surgeries since September 2009 using this technique without any complications.
E Khiangte, I Newme
Surgical intervention
7 years ago
10821 views
63 likes
0 comments
05:09
Single port appendectomy using the EK glove port: a cost-effective innovation
Single port laparoscopic surgery has emerged to enhance the cosmetic benefits and to decrease morbidity in minimally invasive surgery. However, this technique requires a specialized multichannel port (to introduce the laparoscope and instruments) which is very costly and not affordable for the majority of the population. We have improvised a single port access system using readily available materials like surgical gloves, the rigid plastic ring, the inner flexible ring and conventional laparoscopic trocars (the EK Port) with no added cost for the patient. This also eliminates the need for an Alexis® wound retractor. We have performed about 130 single port surgeries since September 2009 using this technique without any complications.
IRCAD Webinar: Third ESPES/IPEG Masterclass with the participation of the ESPU
ACUTE APPENDICITIS and PERITONITIS
1. Laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy in children - Mark Wulkan (IPEG)
2. Single port vs. Multiport and the role of new technologies in the management of pediatric complicated appendicitis - Ciro Esposito (ESPES)

CONGENITAL DIAPHRAGMATIC HERNIA (CDH)
1. Open approach for the treatment of CDH - François Becmeur (ESPES)
2. Minimally invasive management of pediatric CDH - Holger Till (IPEG)

VESICOURETERAL REFLUX (VUR)
1. Open, endourological, and robotic management of pediatric VUR - Ramnath Subramaniam (ESPU)
2. Laparoscopic management of VUR according to Lich-Gregoir procedure - François Varlet (ESPES)

Masters of ceremonies:
François Becmeur (IRCAD-Strasbourg)
Philippe Montupet (APHP-Paris)

Chairmen:
Mario Mendoza Sagaon (ESPES)
Alaa El Ghoneimi (ESPU)
Philippe Szavay (IPEG)
F Becmeur, P Montupet, A El-Ghoneimi, P Szavay, M Mendoza Sagaon, M Wulkan, C Esposito, H Till, R Subramaniam, F Varlet
Surgical intervention
1 year ago
1620 views
89 likes
0 comments
11:17
IRCAD Webinar: Third ESPES/IPEG Masterclass with the participation of the ESPU
ACUTE APPENDICITIS and PERITONITIS
1. Laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy in children - Mark Wulkan (IPEG)
2. Single port vs. Multiport and the role of new technologies in the management of pediatric complicated appendicitis - Ciro Esposito (ESPES)

CONGENITAL DIAPHRAGMATIC HERNIA (CDH)
1. Open approach for the treatment of CDH - François Becmeur (ESPES)
2. Minimally invasive management of pediatric CDH - Holger Till (IPEG)

VESICOURETERAL REFLUX (VUR)
1. Open, endourological, and robotic management of pediatric VUR - Ramnath Subramaniam (ESPU)
2. Laparoscopic management of VUR according to Lich-Gregoir procedure - François Varlet (ESPES)

Masters of ceremonies:
François Becmeur (IRCAD-Strasbourg)
Philippe Montupet (APHP-Paris)

Chairmen:
Mario Mendoza Sagaon (ESPES)
Alaa El Ghoneimi (ESPU)
Philippe Szavay (IPEG)
IRCAD Webinar: Third ESPES/IPEG Masterclass with the participation of the ESPU
ACUTE APPENDICITIS and PERITONITIS
1. Laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy in children - Mark Wulkan (IPEG)
2. Single port vs. Multiport and the role of new technologies in the management of pediatric complicated appendicitis - Ciro Esposito (ESPES)

CONGENITAL DIAPHRAGMATIC HERNIA (CDH)
1. Open approach for the treatment of CDH - François Becmeur (ESPES)
2. Minimally invasive management of pediatric CDH - Holger Till (IPEG)

VESICOURETERAL REFLUX (VUR)
1. Open, endourological, and robotic management of pediatric VUR - Ramnath Subramaniam (ESPU)
2. Laparoscopic management of VUR according to Lich-Gregoir procedure - François Varlet (ESPES)

Masters of ceremonies:
François Becmeur (IRCAD-Strasbourg)
Philippe Montupet (APHP-Paris)

Chairmen:
Mario Mendoza Sagaon (ESPES)
Alaa El Ghoneimi (ESPU)
Philippe Szavay (IPEG)
F Becmeur, P Montupet, A El-Ghoneimi, P Szavay, M Mendoza Sagaon, M Wulkan, C Esposito, H Till, R Subramaniam, F Varlet
Webinar
1 year ago
1101 views
11 likes
0 comments
11:17
IRCAD Webinar: Third ESPES/IPEG Masterclass with the participation of the ESPU
ACUTE APPENDICITIS and PERITONITIS
1. Laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy in children - Mark Wulkan (IPEG)
2. Single port vs. Multiport and the role of new technologies in the management of pediatric complicated appendicitis - Ciro Esposito (ESPES)

CONGENITAL DIAPHRAGMATIC HERNIA (CDH)
1. Open approach for the treatment of CDH - François Becmeur (ESPES)
2. Minimally invasive management of pediatric CDH - Holger Till (IPEG)

VESICOURETERAL REFLUX (VUR)
1. Open, endourological, and robotic management of pediatric VUR - Ramnath Subramaniam (ESPU)
2. Laparoscopic management of VUR according to Lich-Gregoir procedure - François Varlet (ESPES)

Masters of ceremonies:
François Becmeur (IRCAD-Strasbourg)
Philippe Montupet (APHP-Paris)

Chairmen:
Mario Mendoza Sagaon (ESPES)
Alaa El Ghoneimi (ESPU)
Philippe Szavay (IPEG)
Laparoscopic ileocecal resection for unresectable appendix
This is the case of a 36-year-old woman who has had an exploratory laparoscopy in another institution 2 months earlier. Acute appendicitis was suspected, based on ultrasound exam. However, exploration has shown an inflammatory appendicular mass, impossible to dissect. The patient was administered antibiotics for a period of 3 weeks. A laparoscopic appendectomy was decided upon at an interval of 2 months. Work-up included CT-scan and colonoscopy, which did not demonstrate anything specific.
Laparoscopic exploration demonstrated important fibrotic and scarry tissues around the appendix and the cecum. Despite painstaking dissection, appendectomy was impossible. Ileocecal resection was decided upon. Operative steps, namely exposure, division of the last ileal loop, division of the meso, division of the right colon above the ampulla coli and the intracorporeal side-to-side stapled anastomosis are demonstrated. Pathological findings evidenced an endometriotic nodule. The postoperative course was uneventful.
D Mutter, M Ignat, J Marescaux
Surgical intervention
1 year ago
5059 views
333 likes
2 comments
08:23
Laparoscopic ileocecal resection for unresectable appendix
This is the case of a 36-year-old woman who has had an exploratory laparoscopy in another institution 2 months earlier. Acute appendicitis was suspected, based on ultrasound exam. However, exploration has shown an inflammatory appendicular mass, impossible to dissect. The patient was administered antibiotics for a period of 3 weeks. A laparoscopic appendectomy was decided upon at an interval of 2 months. Work-up included CT-scan and colonoscopy, which did not demonstrate anything specific.
Laparoscopic exploration demonstrated important fibrotic and scarry tissues around the appendix and the cecum. Despite painstaking dissection, appendectomy was impossible. Ileocecal resection was decided upon. Operative steps, namely exposure, division of the last ileal loop, division of the meso, division of the right colon above the ampulla coli and the intracorporeal side-to-side stapled anastomosis are demonstrated. Pathological findings evidenced an endometriotic nodule. The postoperative course was uneventful.
Benefit of laparoscopic approach in an appendicular purulent peritonitis
This video is one of a series of laparoscopic appendicectomies and shows the advantage of the videoscopic approach in accessing the entire peritoneal cavity in cases of diffuse peritonitis.
Blood tests revealed an inflammatory syndrome in a young woman with a 3-day history of diffuse abdominal pain and fever. Exploration of the abdominal cavity during emergency laparoscopy confirmed the clinical impressions. The authors performed aspiration and lavage of the peritoneal cavity. Thorough assessment revealed the omentum to be concentrated in the right iliac fossa, and gentle dissection uncovered a necrotic, perforated appendix. Dissection of the cecum and appendix was difficult because the tissues were friable and adherent. The usual tissue planes were not present, but the laparoscopic view allowed for a safe approach.
F Costantino, J Marescaux
Surgical intervention
11 years ago
745 views
100 likes
0 comments
04:04
Benefit of laparoscopic approach in an appendicular purulent peritonitis
This video is one of a series of laparoscopic appendicectomies and shows the advantage of the videoscopic approach in accessing the entire peritoneal cavity in cases of diffuse peritonitis.
Blood tests revealed an inflammatory syndrome in a young woman with a 3-day history of diffuse abdominal pain and fever. Exploration of the abdominal cavity during emergency laparoscopy confirmed the clinical impressions. The authors performed aspiration and lavage of the peritoneal cavity. Thorough assessment revealed the omentum to be concentrated in the right iliac fossa, and gentle dissection uncovered a necrotic, perforated appendix. Dissection of the cecum and appendix was difficult because the tissues were friable and adherent. The usual tissue planes were not present, but the laparoscopic view allowed for a safe approach.
Laparoscopic appendectomy in a young woman, 22 weeks pregnant
This video is one of a series of laparoscopic appendicectomies. Additional pathologies are sometimes discovered during an appendectomy. One should be equally skilled to perform the necessary exploration and intervention by laparoscopy.
The authors use a few technical modifications in this 22-week pregnant patient. They place the left working trocar in the left flank, and the right in the right upper quadrant to avoid the gravid uterus, which occupies most of pelvis and lower abdomen. They examine the uterus and adnexa carefully to rule out any pathology before exposing the appendix. After they reach the base of the appendix and completely dissect the mesoappendix, they ligate the base of the appendix stump with two Vicryl loops. They place the extraction bag in the peritoneal cavity and divide the appendix at the base. Just before retrieving the appendix, the authors cauterize the appendicular stump.
The authors modify their typical laparoscopic approach to accommodate the pregnant woman’s anatomy. As they gain exposure of the appendix, the mesoappendix comes into view. They control the appendicular artery with bipolar coagulation. Sequential application of bipolar cautery and incision with scissors allows them to reach the base of the appendix. Once the authors completely dissect the mesoappendix, they ligate the base of the stump with a Vicryl loop.
D Varela, J Marescaux
Surgical intervention
11 years ago
1174 views
158 likes
0 comments
05:00
Laparoscopic appendectomy in a young woman, 22 weeks pregnant
This video is one of a series of laparoscopic appendicectomies. Additional pathologies are sometimes discovered during an appendectomy. One should be equally skilled to perform the necessary exploration and intervention by laparoscopy.
The authors use a few technical modifications in this 22-week pregnant patient. They place the left working trocar in the left flank, and the right in the right upper quadrant to avoid the gravid uterus, which occupies most of pelvis and lower abdomen. They examine the uterus and adnexa carefully to rule out any pathology before exposing the appendix. After they reach the base of the appendix and completely dissect the mesoappendix, they ligate the base of the appendix stump with two Vicryl loops. They place the extraction bag in the peritoneal cavity and divide the appendix at the base. Just before retrieving the appendix, the authors cauterize the appendicular stump.
The authors modify their typical laparoscopic approach to accommodate the pregnant woman’s anatomy. As they gain exposure of the appendix, the mesoappendix comes into view. They control the appendicular artery with bipolar coagulation. Sequential application of bipolar cautery and incision with scissors allows them to reach the base of the appendix. Once the authors completely dissect the mesoappendix, they ligate the base of the stump with a Vicryl loop.
Laparoscopic appendectomy for abscessed and necrotic appendix
This video of an emergency appendectomy demonstrates some of the advantages of the laparoscopic approach. Multiple abscess cavities are identified by a thorough exploration, including the necrotic appendix. Control of bleeding from the appendiceal artery and control of a gangrenous base of the appendix are clearly shown.

This male patient had emergency surgery after a 1-week history of diffuse abdominal pain with signs of inflammatory syndrome. CT showed a pelvic abscess.

The author begins the laparoscopic approach with a 1-cm incision just above the umbilicus and establishes pneumoperitoneum with the open technique. Dissection of the abscess must proceed cautiously. A suction device in tandem with a probe prove useful for continuing dissection to help mobilize the cecum.

As the appendix comes into view, the author identifies the mesoappendix to begin dissection. Significant edema makes it difficult to continue dissection with the blunt probe, so the author uses bipolar cautery to begin dissection of the mesoappendix.
A Rossini
Surgical intervention
12 years ago
10080 views
85 likes
0 comments
05:04
Laparoscopic appendectomy for abscessed and necrotic appendix
This video of an emergency appendectomy demonstrates some of the advantages of the laparoscopic approach. Multiple abscess cavities are identified by a thorough exploration, including the necrotic appendix. Control of bleeding from the appendiceal artery and control of a gangrenous base of the appendix are clearly shown.

This male patient had emergency surgery after a 1-week history of diffuse abdominal pain with signs of inflammatory syndrome. CT showed a pelvic abscess.

The author begins the laparoscopic approach with a 1-cm incision just above the umbilicus and establishes pneumoperitoneum with the open technique. Dissection of the abscess must proceed cautiously. A suction device in tandem with a probe prove useful for continuing dissection to help mobilize the cecum.

As the appendix comes into view, the author identifies the mesoappendix to begin dissection. Significant edema makes it difficult to continue dissection with the blunt probe, so the author uses bipolar cautery to begin dissection of the mesoappendix.