We use cookies to offer you an optimal experience on our website. By browsing our website, you accept the use of cookies.
Filter by
Specialty
View more
Technologies
View more
Clear filter Media type
View more
Clear filter Category
View more
Publication date
Sort by:
Laparoscopic Spigelian hernia repair
Spigelian hernia is a rare condition and it is difficult to diagnose it clinically. It has been estimated to account for 0.12% of abdominal wall hernias. The hernia ring is a well-defined defect in the transversus abdominis aponeurosis. The hernia sac, surrounded with extraperitoneal adipose tissue, often lies interparietally passing through the transversus abdominis and the internal oblique muscle aponeuroses and then spreading out beneath the intact aponeurosis of the external oblique muscle. The laparoscopic repair is well-established. Most authors use a transperitoneal approach either by placing the mesh in an intraperitoneal position or by raising the peritoneal flap and placing the mesh in the extraperitoneal space. In this video, we demonstrate the laparoscopic repair of a Spigelian hernia through the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) placement of a composite mesh.
A D'Urso, D Mutter, J Marescaux
Surgical intervention
6 months ago
2332 views
11 likes
2 comments
08:23
Laparoscopic Spigelian hernia repair
Spigelian hernia is a rare condition and it is difficult to diagnose it clinically. It has been estimated to account for 0.12% of abdominal wall hernias. The hernia ring is a well-defined defect in the transversus abdominis aponeurosis. The hernia sac, surrounded with extraperitoneal adipose tissue, often lies interparietally passing through the transversus abdominis and the internal oblique muscle aponeuroses and then spreading out beneath the intact aponeurosis of the external oblique muscle. The laparoscopic repair is well-established. Most authors use a transperitoneal approach either by placing the mesh in an intraperitoneal position or by raising the peritoneal flap and placing the mesh in the extraperitoneal space. In this video, we demonstrate the laparoscopic repair of a Spigelian hernia through the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) placement of a composite mesh.
Complex cases in laparoscopic recurrent and incisional hernia repair: multi-recurrence, infections, fistulas, difficult abdomen
The term ‘‘complex (abdominal wall) hernia’’ is often used by general surgeons and other specialists working in the abdomen to describe abdominal wall hernias which are technically challenging and time-consuming.

Four categories were created to classify and discuss the criteria, which were proposed to be included in the definition of ‘‘complex abdominal wall hernia’’: defect size and location, patient history and risk factors, contamination and soft tissue condition, and clinical scenario.
Defect size is an important variable; increased size is a risk factor for 30-day readmission rate and recurrence.
Wound contamination is usually classified according to the US National Research Council Group including clean, clean-contaminated, contaminated, and dirty/infected. It is well-known that contamination and subsequent infection are an important cause of wound dehiscence and reherniation which impair wound healing dynamics.
A recurrent hernia is considered a risk factor for a new recurrence.
Patient status is an important factor. Conditions such as abnormal collagen type I/type III ratio and genetic connective tissue disorders are associated with an increased risk of herniation. Older age, male gender, chronic pulmonary disease, coughing, ascites, jaundice, anemia, emergency surgery, wound infection, obesity, steroid use, hypoalbuminemia, hypertension, perioperative shock are also important risk factors.

The reported incidence of incisional hernia is about 2 to 11% after all laparotomies.
The ideal repair for an abdominal incisional hernia is to restore the anatomical and physiological integrity of the abdominal wall by reconstructing the midline. However, 30 to 50% of defects larger than 6cm recur after primary closure.
The insertion of a synthetic mesh helps to decrease or relieve tension on the suture line and can reduce the incidence of recurrence to 10% or less.
But foreign prosthetic materials have been associated with a high risk of complications such as protrusion, extrusion, infection, and intestinal fistulization.
Laparoscopic repair has provided further improvements with lower infection rates, shorter hospital stay, and a reduction in recurrence with rates of 4 to 16% in recent studies.
In this topic addressing complex laparoscopic cases, we show different scenarios including recurrent infected incisional hernia, fistulization, multi-recurrent incisional hernia, migration, and conversion.
A D'Urso, D Mutter, J Marescaux
Surgical intervention
2 months ago
5553 views
1 like
0 comments
03:00
Complex cases in laparoscopic recurrent and incisional hernia repair: multi-recurrence, infections, fistulas, difficult abdomen
The term ‘‘complex (abdominal wall) hernia’’ is often used by general surgeons and other specialists working in the abdomen to describe abdominal wall hernias which are technically challenging and time-consuming.

Four categories were created to classify and discuss the criteria, which were proposed to be included in the definition of ‘‘complex abdominal wall hernia’’: defect size and location, patient history and risk factors, contamination and soft tissue condition, and clinical scenario.
Defect size is an important variable; increased size is a risk factor for 30-day readmission rate and recurrence.
Wound contamination is usually classified according to the US National Research Council Group including clean, clean-contaminated, contaminated, and dirty/infected. It is well-known that contamination and subsequent infection are an important cause of wound dehiscence and reherniation which impair wound healing dynamics.
A recurrent hernia is considered a risk factor for a new recurrence.
Patient status is an important factor. Conditions such as abnormal collagen type I/type III ratio and genetic connective tissue disorders are associated with an increased risk of herniation. Older age, male gender, chronic pulmonary disease, coughing, ascites, jaundice, anemia, emergency surgery, wound infection, obesity, steroid use, hypoalbuminemia, hypertension, perioperative shock are also important risk factors.

The reported incidence of incisional hernia is about 2 to 11% after all laparotomies.
The ideal repair for an abdominal incisional hernia is to restore the anatomical and physiological integrity of the abdominal wall by reconstructing the midline. However, 30 to 50% of defects larger than 6cm recur after primary closure.
The insertion of a synthetic mesh helps to decrease or relieve tension on the suture line and can reduce the incidence of recurrence to 10% or less.
But foreign prosthetic materials have been associated with a high risk of complications such as protrusion, extrusion, infection, and intestinal fistulization.
Laparoscopic repair has provided further improvements with lower infection rates, shorter hospital stay, and a reduction in recurrence with rates of 4 to 16% in recent studies.
In this topic addressing complex laparoscopic cases, we show different scenarios including recurrent infected incisional hernia, fistulization, multi-recurrent incisional hernia, migration, and conversion.
Recurrent and incisional hernia repair: complex cases
The term ‘‘complex (abdominal wall) hernia’’ is often used by general surgeons and other specialists working in the abdomen to describe abdominal wall hernias which are technically challenging and time-consuming.

Four categories were created to classify and discuss the criteria, which were proposed to be included in the definition of ‘‘complex abdominal wall hernia’’: defect size and location, patient history and risk factors, contamination and soft tissue condition, and clinical scenario.
Defect size is an important variable; increased size is a risk factor for 30-day readmission rate and recurrence.
Wound contamination is usually classified according to the US National Research Council Group including clean, clean-contaminated, contaminated, and dirty/infected. It is well-known that contamination and subsequent infection are an important cause of wound dehiscence and reherniation which impair wound healing dynamics.
A recurrent hernia is considered a risk factor for a new recurrence.
Patient status is an important factor. Conditions such as abnormal collagen type I/type III ratio and genetic connective tissue disorders are associated with an increased risk of herniation. Older age, male gender, chronic pulmonary disease, coughing, ascites, jaundice, anemia, emergency surgery, wound infection, obesity, steroid use, hypoalbuminemia, hypertension, perioperative shock are also important risk factors.

The reported incidence of incisional hernia is about 2 to 11% after all laparotomies.
The ideal repair for an abdominal incisional hernia is to restore the anatomical and physiological integrity of the abdominal wall by reconstructing the midline. However, 30 to 50% of defects larger than 6cm recur after primary closure.
The insertion of a synthetic mesh helps to decrease or relieve tension on the suture line and can reduce the incidence of recurrence to 10% or less.
But foreign prosthetic materials have been associated with a high risk of complications such as protrusion, extrusion, infection, and intestinal fistulization.
Laparoscopic repair has provided further improvements with lower infection rates, shorter hospital stay, and a reduction in recurrence with rates of 4 to 16% in recent studies.
In this topic addressing complex laparoscopic cases, we show different scenarios including recurrent infected incisional hernia, fistulization, multi-recurrent incisional hernia, migration, and conversion.
A D'Urso, D Mutter, J Marescaux
State of the art
3 months ago
1063 views
4 likes
0 comments
00:00
Recurrent and incisional hernia repair: complex cases
The term ‘‘complex (abdominal wall) hernia’’ is often used by general surgeons and other specialists working in the abdomen to describe abdominal wall hernias which are technically challenging and time-consuming.

Four categories were created to classify and discuss the criteria, which were proposed to be included in the definition of ‘‘complex abdominal wall hernia’’: defect size and location, patient history and risk factors, contamination and soft tissue condition, and clinical scenario.
Defect size is an important variable; increased size is a risk factor for 30-day readmission rate and recurrence.
Wound contamination is usually classified according to the US National Research Council Group including clean, clean-contaminated, contaminated, and dirty/infected. It is well-known that contamination and subsequent infection are an important cause of wound dehiscence and reherniation which impair wound healing dynamics.
A recurrent hernia is considered a risk factor for a new recurrence.
Patient status is an important factor. Conditions such as abnormal collagen type I/type III ratio and genetic connective tissue disorders are associated with an increased risk of herniation. Older age, male gender, chronic pulmonary disease, coughing, ascites, jaundice, anemia, emergency surgery, wound infection, obesity, steroid use, hypoalbuminemia, hypertension, perioperative shock are also important risk factors.

The reported incidence of incisional hernia is about 2 to 11% after all laparotomies.
The ideal repair for an abdominal incisional hernia is to restore the anatomical and physiological integrity of the abdominal wall by reconstructing the midline. However, 30 to 50% of defects larger than 6cm recur after primary closure.
The insertion of a synthetic mesh helps to decrease or relieve tension on the suture line and can reduce the incidence of recurrence to 10% or less.
But foreign prosthetic materials have been associated with a high risk of complications such as protrusion, extrusion, infection, and intestinal fistulization.
Laparoscopic repair has provided further improvements with lower infection rates, shorter hospital stay, and a reduction in recurrence with rates of 4 to 16% in recent studies.
In this topic addressing complex laparoscopic cases, we show different scenarios including recurrent infected incisional hernia, fistulization, multi-recurrent incisional hernia, migration, and conversion.
Laparoscopic excision of urachal cyst - a minimally invasive approach of a rare cause of abdominal pain in adults
Congenital abnormalities of the urachus are rare, with an incidence of 2:300000 children and 1:5000 adults. The urachus is a fibrous remnant of the allantois, usually occluded in the 4-5th gestational months, with the descent of the bladder towards the pelvis. It lies in the space of Retzius, between the transverse fascia anteriorly and the peritoneum posteriorly. The absence of its obliteration can result in an urachal cyst in 36% of cases. The main complication of the cyst is focal infection with associated risks of rupture and intestinal involvement. Diagnosis relies on clinical history, abdominopelvic ultrasonography and CT-scan. The treatment consists in complete excision of abnormal tissue and a small portion of adjacent bladder wall, therefore reducing the risk of malignant degeneration of the entire remnant.
A twenty-year-old healthy woman was referred to the emergency department with localized discomfort and a foul smelling purulent discharge from the umbilicus with three days of evolution. The patient was afebrile with periumbilical inflammatory signs, without signs of peritoneal irritation on physical exam. Blood tests were all normal, apart from a raised C-reactive protein (2.52mg/dL). Abdominal ultrasound was suggestive of an infected urachal cyst with umbilical fistulization. Empirical treatment with antibiotics was started and an abdominopelvic CT-scan, made as outpatient surgery, showed a probable 26mm urachal cyst, posterior and adjacent to the umbilicus, without bladder attachment.
The patient was treated surgically with a laparoscopic excision of the remainder of the urachus, without intraoperative complications. A good clinical evolution was observed during the hospital stay, and the patient was discharged on the fourth postoperative day. On follow-up, the patient did not complain of anything.
This clinical case emphasizes the importance of the high index of diagnostic suspicion in the management and treatment of the rare causes of abdominal pain, often with the possibility of a minimally invasive approach.
A Tojal, AR Loureiro, B Prata, R Patrão, N Carrilho, C Casimiro
Surgical intervention
6 months ago
975 views
3 likes
0 comments
10:34
Laparoscopic excision of urachal cyst - a minimally invasive approach of a rare cause of abdominal pain in adults
Congenital abnormalities of the urachus are rare, with an incidence of 2:300000 children and 1:5000 adults. The urachus is a fibrous remnant of the allantois, usually occluded in the 4-5th gestational months, with the descent of the bladder towards the pelvis. It lies in the space of Retzius, between the transverse fascia anteriorly and the peritoneum posteriorly. The absence of its obliteration can result in an urachal cyst in 36% of cases. The main complication of the cyst is focal infection with associated risks of rupture and intestinal involvement. Diagnosis relies on clinical history, abdominopelvic ultrasonography and CT-scan. The treatment consists in complete excision of abnormal tissue and a small portion of adjacent bladder wall, therefore reducing the risk of malignant degeneration of the entire remnant.
A twenty-year-old healthy woman was referred to the emergency department with localized discomfort and a foul smelling purulent discharge from the umbilicus with three days of evolution. The patient was afebrile with periumbilical inflammatory signs, without signs of peritoneal irritation on physical exam. Blood tests were all normal, apart from a raised C-reactive protein (2.52mg/dL). Abdominal ultrasound was suggestive of an infected urachal cyst with umbilical fistulization. Empirical treatment with antibiotics was started and an abdominopelvic CT-scan, made as outpatient surgery, showed a probable 26mm urachal cyst, posterior and adjacent to the umbilicus, without bladder attachment.
The patient was treated surgically with a laparoscopic excision of the remainder of the urachus, without intraoperative complications. A good clinical evolution was observed during the hospital stay, and the patient was discharged on the fourth postoperative day. On follow-up, the patient did not complain of anything.
This clinical case emphasizes the importance of the high index of diagnostic suspicion in the management and treatment of the rare causes of abdominal pain, often with the possibility of a minimally invasive approach.
Left iliac fossa incisional hernia: live laparoscopic repair
Dr. Salvador Morales-Conde presents the clinical case of a 59-year old female patient managed for an incisional hernia with a 6-7cm sac in the left lower quadrant. The patient’s history included a left iliac fossa laparotomy to control bleeding caused by an epigastric artery injury following a laparoscopic appendectomy. The patient was placed in a Trendelenburg position. An optical port and two 5mm operating ports were inserted on the right lateral side of the abdomen. Peritoneal dissection was performed to expose anatomical landmarks including pubic bone, iliac crest, and iliac vessels for proper mesh fixation. The defect of the abdominal wall was closed using a continuous suture. A trimmed mesh (Parietex™ Composite Mesh) was inserted and fixed with tackers to Cooper’s ligament, to the iliac crest, and to the abdominal wall to sufficiently cover the sutured defect. Finally, the preperitoneal flap was fixed on the mesh to prevent intestines from getting into the mesh gap.
S Morales-Conde, T Urade, D Mutter, J Marescaux
Surgical intervention
6 months ago
4554 views
17 likes
2 comments
42:53
Left iliac fossa incisional hernia: live laparoscopic repair
Dr. Salvador Morales-Conde presents the clinical case of a 59-year old female patient managed for an incisional hernia with a 6-7cm sac in the left lower quadrant. The patient’s history included a left iliac fossa laparotomy to control bleeding caused by an epigastric artery injury following a laparoscopic appendectomy. The patient was placed in a Trendelenburg position. An optical port and two 5mm operating ports were inserted on the right lateral side of the abdomen. Peritoneal dissection was performed to expose anatomical landmarks including pubic bone, iliac crest, and iliac vessels for proper mesh fixation. The defect of the abdominal wall was closed using a continuous suture. A trimmed mesh (Parietex™ Composite Mesh) was inserted and fixed with tackers to Cooper’s ligament, to the iliac crest, and to the abdominal wall to sufficiently cover the sutured defect. Finally, the preperitoneal flap was fixed on the mesh to prevent intestines from getting into the mesh gap.
Laparoscopic TAPP approach to bilateral reducible inguinal hernia: live interactive procedure
We present the clinical case of a 57-year old male patient managed for a bilateral reducible inguinal hernia. The patient’s history included a right inguinal hernia repair in his childhood. A first port was inserted 1cm above the umbilicus and two 5mm ports were placed 7cm away from the umbilicus on the right and left side. Peritoneal dissection starts with a horizontal incision and parietalization is performed carefully to avoid injury to the vessels and deferent duct. After the myopectineal orifice has been sufficiently exposed, polypropylene meshes (Parietene™) trimmed to a 13 by 12cm size are inserted into the preperitoneal cavity and fixed using absorbable tacks. Finally, the meshes are fully covered using peritoneal flaps.
D Mutter, T Urade, J Marescaux
Surgical intervention
6 months ago
7776 views
49 likes
0 comments
46:18
Laparoscopic TAPP approach to bilateral reducible inguinal hernia: live interactive procedure
We present the clinical case of a 57-year old male patient managed for a bilateral reducible inguinal hernia. The patient’s history included a right inguinal hernia repair in his childhood. A first port was inserted 1cm above the umbilicus and two 5mm ports were placed 7cm away from the umbilicus on the right and left side. Peritoneal dissection starts with a horizontal incision and parietalization is performed carefully to avoid injury to the vessels and deferent duct. After the myopectineal orifice has been sufficiently exposed, polypropylene meshes (Parietene™) trimmed to a 13 by 12cm size are inserted into the preperitoneal cavity and fixed using absorbable tacks. Finally, the meshes are fully covered using peritoneal flaps.
Laparoscopic TEP unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a live interactive procedure
We present the clinical case of a 45-year old male patient managed for a right direct inguinal hernia. The patient’s history included a former approach for right inguinal hernia in his childhood and a laparoscopic left inguinal hernia repair. A first port was inserted below the umbilicus and access to the pubic bone was gained on the midline without using balloon. In this case, dissection of adhesions related to the previous operation was required. Attempts were made to identify anatomical landmarks after insertion of 5mm ports. The direct hernia content was dissected and reduced with blunt dissection. Once anatomical landmarks including pubic symphysis, Cooper’s ligament, epigastric vessels, spermatic cord, and psoas muscle were identified, a trimmed polypropylene mesh was inserted and the myopectineal orifice was sufficiently covered without fixation. Finally, the preperitoneal cavity was desufflated to complete the procedure.
B Dallemagne, T Urade, D Mutter, J Marescaux
Surgical intervention
6 months ago
1900 views
18 likes
1 comment
39:46
Laparoscopic TEP unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a live interactive procedure
We present the clinical case of a 45-year old male patient managed for a right direct inguinal hernia. The patient’s history included a former approach for right inguinal hernia in his childhood and a laparoscopic left inguinal hernia repair. A first port was inserted below the umbilicus and access to the pubic bone was gained on the midline without using balloon. In this case, dissection of adhesions related to the previous operation was required. Attempts were made to identify anatomical landmarks after insertion of 5mm ports. The direct hernia content was dissected and reduced with blunt dissection. Once anatomical landmarks including pubic symphysis, Cooper’s ligament, epigastric vessels, spermatic cord, and psoas muscle were identified, a trimmed polypropylene mesh was inserted and the myopectineal orifice was sufficiently covered without fixation. Finally, the preperitoneal cavity was desufflated to complete the procedure.
Laparoscopic resection of inguinal recurrence of myxoid liposarcoma
This is the case of a laparoscopic resection of inguinal recurrence of myxoid liposarcoma (MLS). In 2003, a 29-year-old man presented with a 23cm right thigh mass, compatible with soft tissue sarcoma. He underwent radical surgery and the final pathological examination confirmed a grade 1 myxoid liposarcoma. He received adjuvant radiotherapy (70 Gy). Follow-up demonstrated that the patient was disease-free until 2015. In September 2017, he presented to the emergency room with a lower right extremity edema. Radiological examination demonstrated the presence of an 8cm inguinal mass compatible with a late inguinal recurrence of known sarcoma. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was indicated and elective surgery was performed in January 2018. CT-scan revealed a mass in the preperitoneal space, displacing the urinary bladder medially, involving right external iliac vessels and getting into the femoral canal distally. A laparoscopic approach was decided upon.
C Rodríguez-Otero Luppi, M Rodríguez Blanco, E Ballester Vázquez, V Artigas Raventós
Surgical intervention
1 year ago
987 views
37 likes
0 comments
09:00
Laparoscopic resection of inguinal recurrence of myxoid liposarcoma
This is the case of a laparoscopic resection of inguinal recurrence of myxoid liposarcoma (MLS). In 2003, a 29-year-old man presented with a 23cm right thigh mass, compatible with soft tissue sarcoma. He underwent radical surgery and the final pathological examination confirmed a grade 1 myxoid liposarcoma. He received adjuvant radiotherapy (70 Gy). Follow-up demonstrated that the patient was disease-free until 2015. In September 2017, he presented to the emergency room with a lower right extremity edema. Radiological examination demonstrated the presence of an 8cm inguinal mass compatible with a late inguinal recurrence of known sarcoma. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was indicated and elective surgery was performed in January 2018. CT-scan revealed a mass in the preperitoneal space, displacing the urinary bladder medially, involving right external iliac vessels and getting into the femoral canal distally. A laparoscopic approach was decided upon.
A rare cause of abdominal pain (liposarcoma) treated by a minimally invasive approach
A 53-year-old woman is referred to the emergency department with complaints of an insidious pain in the left lower abdominal quadrant, with no associated fever, neither changes in her bowel habits, nor other complaints. She had a cardiac arrhythmia, medicated with atenolol, and no previous surgeries. Laboratory results showed no significant changes. Abdominal ultrasound demonstrated an inflammatory mass adjacent to the left colon. The abdominal and pelvic CT-scan showed a bulky and capsulated mass at the left iliac fossa extending along the left flank until the lower pole of the left kidney, measuring 9x12x20cm, probably corresponding to a peritoneal lipoma, with no signs of aggressiveness towards adjacent organs. The patient was admitted to hospital for clinical vigilance and complementary exams. Upper and lower endoscopic studies were performed and revealed no significant changes. The patient was then proposed for elective surgery – laparoscopic excision of the intra-abdominal mass, which was independent of the intra-abdominal visceral content. In the postoperative period, the patient had no complications with clinical discharge four days after surgery. The pathology report revealed a well-differentiated lipomatous neoplasia, a lipoma-like liposarcoma. In a multidisciplinary meeting, it was decided not to perform any adjuvant treatment. The patient remains with neither clinical nor imaging signs of the disease after 10 months of follow-up.
A Tojal, J Marques, S Coelho, M Fernandes, N Carrilho, H Oliveira, C Casimiro
Surgical intervention
1 year ago
1039 views
63 likes
0 comments
07:41
A rare cause of abdominal pain (liposarcoma) treated by a minimally invasive approach
A 53-year-old woman is referred to the emergency department with complaints of an insidious pain in the left lower abdominal quadrant, with no associated fever, neither changes in her bowel habits, nor other complaints. She had a cardiac arrhythmia, medicated with atenolol, and no previous surgeries. Laboratory results showed no significant changes. Abdominal ultrasound demonstrated an inflammatory mass adjacent to the left colon. The abdominal and pelvic CT-scan showed a bulky and capsulated mass at the left iliac fossa extending along the left flank until the lower pole of the left kidney, measuring 9x12x20cm, probably corresponding to a peritoneal lipoma, with no signs of aggressiveness towards adjacent organs. The patient was admitted to hospital for clinical vigilance and complementary exams. Upper and lower endoscopic studies were performed and revealed no significant changes. The patient was then proposed for elective surgery – laparoscopic excision of the intra-abdominal mass, which was independent of the intra-abdominal visceral content. In the postoperative period, the patient had no complications with clinical discharge four days after surgery. The pathology report revealed a well-differentiated lipomatous neoplasia, a lipoma-like liposarcoma. In a multidisciplinary meeting, it was decided not to perform any adjuvant treatment. The patient remains with neither clinical nor imaging signs of the disease after 10 months of follow-up.
LIVE INTERACTIVE SURGERY: left direct inguinal hernia: laparoscopic TAPP approach
We present the clinical case of a 50-year-old patient managed for a left direct symptomatic reducible inguinal hernia, with a palpable impulse on examination. The patient’s history included a left indirect inguinal hernia repair in his childhood.

The procedure begins conventionally with an open laparoscopy with the introduction of a supra-umbilical port. The exploration confirms the presence of a left hernia and rules out the diagnosis of right hernia. Dissection starts with a horizontal peritoneal incision, which allows to progressively parietalize all elements of the cord, making sure to stay in contact with the peritoneum. Dissection of the previously operated hernia dating back to the patient’s childhood is slightly more painstaking and constraining due to the presence of adhesion-related scars. However, the parietalization of the peritoneum is carried on without any particular problem, and considering that it is a direct hernia, the deferent duct is very easily identified and parietalized. Reduction of the direct hernia is performed easily with the reintroduction of the transversalis fascia. Given the small size of the hernia, the fascia will not be exteriorized.

After complete lowering, a 15 X 15cm polypropylene mesh (Parietene™) is recut to a 13 X 12cm size with external trimming. The mesh is positioned in order to cover all direct and internal hernial orifices. It is only fixed to Cooper’s ligament, to the anterior superior iliac spine, and to the anterior abdominal wall so as to prevent any early mobilization postoperatively. Reperitonization is then performed with peritoneal fixation using absorbable staples (of the AbsorbaTack™ type). Exsufflation is achieved under visual guidance.

The entire procedure is performed as an outpatient surgery. The patient was admitted to our unit just before the intervention. He is discharged a few hours later.
D Mutter, J Marescaux
Surgical intervention
1 year ago
19193 views
1405 likes
0 comments
25:14
LIVE INTERACTIVE SURGERY: left direct inguinal hernia: laparoscopic TAPP approach
We present the clinical case of a 50-year-old patient managed for a left direct symptomatic reducible inguinal hernia, with a palpable impulse on examination. The patient’s history included a left indirect inguinal hernia repair in his childhood.

The procedure begins conventionally with an open laparoscopy with the introduction of a supra-umbilical port. The exploration confirms the presence of a left hernia and rules out the diagnosis of right hernia. Dissection starts with a horizontal peritoneal incision, which allows to progressively parietalize all elements of the cord, making sure to stay in contact with the peritoneum. Dissection of the previously operated hernia dating back to the patient’s childhood is slightly more painstaking and constraining due to the presence of adhesion-related scars. However, the parietalization of the peritoneum is carried on without any particular problem, and considering that it is a direct hernia, the deferent duct is very easily identified and parietalized. Reduction of the direct hernia is performed easily with the reintroduction of the transversalis fascia. Given the small size of the hernia, the fascia will not be exteriorized.

After complete lowering, a 15 X 15cm polypropylene mesh (Parietene™) is recut to a 13 X 12cm size with external trimming. The mesh is positioned in order to cover all direct and internal hernial orifices. It is only fixed to Cooper’s ligament, to the anterior superior iliac spine, and to the anterior abdominal wall so as to prevent any early mobilization postoperatively. Reperitonization is then performed with peritoneal fixation using absorbable staples (of the AbsorbaTack™ type). Exsufflation is achieved under visual guidance.

The entire procedure is performed as an outpatient surgery. The patient was admitted to our unit just before the intervention. He is discharged a few hours later.
Laparoscopic prosthetic parastomal and perineal hernias repair after abdominoperineal resection
Background: In this video, the authors report the case of a 74-year-old woman who consulted for episodes of intestinal occlusions following an abdomino-perineal resection for rectal adenocarcinoma (pT2N0M0), performed 6 years earlier. Abdomino-pelvic CT-scan showed a parastomal hernia with migrated small bowel loops and a perineal hernia with transposition of the caecum and bowel loops into the pelvis. Preoperative work-up was negative for tumor recurrence, hence a laparoscopic treatment using a double dual face prosthesis was proposed.

Video: Three trocars were placed into the abdomen. After adhesiolysis and removal of the viscera herniated into the hernia, the parastomal defect was exposed and measured intracorporeally 6cm (cranio-caudally) and 4cm (latero-laterally). An intracorporeal suture was used to close the defect, and a dual face prosthesis of 15cm in length and 10cm in width (Surgimesh XB, Aspide Medical, Saint-Etienne, France) was fixed by means of absorbable tacks (Sorbafix, Bard Davol Inc., Warwick, RI, US), according to the Sugarbaker technique. Successively, the pelvis was freed from adhesions, and the superior pelvic opening appeared to be 8cm (antero-posteriorly) and 7cm (latero-laterally). A dual face circular prosthesis of 10cm (Surgimesh XB, Aspide Medical) was fixed using two running sutures around the superior pelvic opening.

Results: Operative time was 72 minutes for parastomal hernia and 95 minutes for perineal hernia. Operative bleeding was unsignificant. The patient was discharged after 3 days, and at visit consultations, she did not present with any recurrence.

Conclusion: Prosthetic parastomal and perineal hernias repair can be performed simultaneously using laparoscopy with the same port positioning, adding the advantages of minimally invasive surgery and avoiding a large laparotomy.
G Dapri, L Gerard, L Cardinali, D Repullo, I Surdeanu, SH Sondji, GB Cadière
Surgical intervention
2 years ago
1187 views
117 likes
0 comments
07:20
Laparoscopic prosthetic parastomal and perineal hernias repair after abdominoperineal resection
Background: In this video, the authors report the case of a 74-year-old woman who consulted for episodes of intestinal occlusions following an abdomino-perineal resection for rectal adenocarcinoma (pT2N0M0), performed 6 years earlier. Abdomino-pelvic CT-scan showed a parastomal hernia with migrated small bowel loops and a perineal hernia with transposition of the caecum and bowel loops into the pelvis. Preoperative work-up was negative for tumor recurrence, hence a laparoscopic treatment using a double dual face prosthesis was proposed.

Video: Three trocars were placed into the abdomen. After adhesiolysis and removal of the viscera herniated into the hernia, the parastomal defect was exposed and measured intracorporeally 6cm (cranio-caudally) and 4cm (latero-laterally). An intracorporeal suture was used to close the defect, and a dual face prosthesis of 15cm in length and 10cm in width (Surgimesh XB, Aspide Medical, Saint-Etienne, France) was fixed by means of absorbable tacks (Sorbafix, Bard Davol Inc., Warwick, RI, US), according to the Sugarbaker technique. Successively, the pelvis was freed from adhesions, and the superior pelvic opening appeared to be 8cm (antero-posteriorly) and 7cm (latero-laterally). A dual face circular prosthesis of 10cm (Surgimesh XB, Aspide Medical) was fixed using two running sutures around the superior pelvic opening.

Results: Operative time was 72 minutes for parastomal hernia and 95 minutes for perineal hernia. Operative bleeding was unsignificant. The patient was discharged after 3 days, and at visit consultations, she did not present with any recurrence.

Conclusion: Prosthetic parastomal and perineal hernias repair can be performed simultaneously using laparoscopy with the same port positioning, adding the advantages of minimally invasive surgery and avoiding a large laparotomy.
Transumbilical single-access laparoscopic subxiphoidal incisional hernia repair
Background: In this video, the authors report the case of a 65-year-old man who consulted for a subxiphoidal incisional hernia after open cardiac surgery. A transumbilical single access laparoscopic repair was proposed.

Video: The umbilical scar was incised and, after having placed a fascial umbilical purse-string suture, an 11mm reusable trocar was introduced. DAPRI curved reusable instruments (Karl Storz Endoskope, Tuttlingen, Germany) were introduced. The subxiphoidal hernia was put in evidence. The fatty tissue covering the defect was freed and the hernia defect was measured to be 8cm cranio-caudally and 6cm latero-laterally. A dual face mesh of 15 and 14cm (Surgimesh XB, Aspide Medical, Saint-Etienne, France) was chosen and introduced into the cavity through the 11mm trocar. The mesh was fixed against the abdominal wall using absorbable tacks (Sorbafix, Bard Davol Inc., Warwick, RI, US), and against the pericardial sheet using a polypropylene suture, in order to prevent any potential cardiac tamponade.

Results: The final umbilical scar was 15mm. Operative time was 65 minutes, and operative bleeding was insignificant. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 1. At visit consultations, no recurrence was evidenced.

Conclusion: Subxiphoidal incisional hernia after open cardiac surgery can be treated successfully using a transumbilical single access laparoscopy.
G Dapri, A Cadenas Febres, L Cardinali, SH Sondji, I Surdeanu, GB Cadière
Surgical intervention
2 years ago
1482 views
132 likes
0 comments
06:30
Transumbilical single-access laparoscopic subxiphoidal incisional hernia repair
Background: In this video, the authors report the case of a 65-year-old man who consulted for a subxiphoidal incisional hernia after open cardiac surgery. A transumbilical single access laparoscopic repair was proposed.

Video: The umbilical scar was incised and, after having placed a fascial umbilical purse-string suture, an 11mm reusable trocar was introduced. DAPRI curved reusable instruments (Karl Storz Endoskope, Tuttlingen, Germany) were introduced. The subxiphoidal hernia was put in evidence. The fatty tissue covering the defect was freed and the hernia defect was measured to be 8cm cranio-caudally and 6cm latero-laterally. A dual face mesh of 15 and 14cm (Surgimesh XB, Aspide Medical, Saint-Etienne, France) was chosen and introduced into the cavity through the 11mm trocar. The mesh was fixed against the abdominal wall using absorbable tacks (Sorbafix, Bard Davol Inc., Warwick, RI, US), and against the pericardial sheet using a polypropylene suture, in order to prevent any potential cardiac tamponade.

Results: The final umbilical scar was 15mm. Operative time was 65 minutes, and operative bleeding was insignificant. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 1. At visit consultations, no recurrence was evidenced.

Conclusion: Subxiphoidal incisional hernia after open cardiac surgery can be treated successfully using a transumbilical single access laparoscopy.