We use cookies to offer you an optimal experience on our website. By browsing our website, you accept the use of cookies.

Contributions

Share your knowledge and know-how with the largest online community of surgeons!

You can contribute to WebSurg by submitting your minimally invasive surgery videos that will help us increase the scope of our educational content. This is a unique opportunity for you to share your surgical skills with the largest community of surgeons worldwide, and become part of our international Faculty.

You’re not an expert in video editing? No problem! Submit the video of your surgical procedure and our editorial and audiovisual team will take care of the rest for free.

Upload your video

You must be logged in to watch this video. Click here to access your account, or here to register for free!

Requirements

In order to be published on WebSurg, you need to make sure that your video brings something relevant to WebSurg. Send us a video demonstrating a comprehensive surgical case which has not been covered on the website yet. The objective of contributions is to offer varied types of educational videos to our members, in a more interactive, didactic, and original way.

The quality of the video must be high-definition to be considered for a potential publication on WebSurg. An abstract of less than 250 words to present the case and educational objectives of the video, the titles of the key steps (e.g. timed chapters of the video such as "case history", "patient set-up and port position", etc. mentioning minutes and seconds), and author name(s) have to be submitted along with your video. These indications will allow our editorial team to perform a synchronized voice over and to provide relevant content to our members.

Advantages

It is fast, free, and user-friendly. Publishing your work on the world’s number 1 minimally invasive surgery website is a great opportunity for you to share your expertise and your surgical skills with the rest of the world. We highlight our contributors by sharing their publications with our 370,000 members, and we provide them statistics allowing them to measure the impact their video had on our community.

Who can contribute?

Anyone is welcome to submit their contributions, whether it is to share a new technique, a novel technological innovation or to present a standard surgical procedure in compliance with international guidelines and consensus recommendations in an original and didactic way.

Validation process

Videos submitted to us are sent to a peer-review committee who will decide if the video can be published on WebSurg. This decision depends on the technical quality of the video and on its scientific relevance and compliance with international guidelines, but also on its originality. We remain at your disposal throughout this process to inform you on the status of your video publication.

Should your video not be validated by our editorial team, we will give you the reasons for this. However you are still more than welcome to send us more videos.

Get more info

Video structure

01.

Title

10s
02.

List of authors

10s

Author names and their titles (MD, PhD, etc.).

03.

Clinical case

15-20s

Patient age and gender, clinical and medical history, surgical indications, etc. Views of CT-scans, MRI or other diagnostic tools. Find a template on this page.

04.

Patient

15-20s

Patient, trocar, and operating staff position.

05.

Film

~15 minutes

English video written narrative with a full description of the surgical procedure and of the postoperative outcomes.

06.

Credits

5-10s

What are you waiting for? Become a WebSurg expert!

Contribute now

The latest contributions

Surgical intervention
11:10
Three-trocar laparoscopic right ileocolectomy for advanced small bowel neuroendocrine tumor
Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was shown to offer advantages in general and oncologic surgery (1). Over the last decade, reduced port laparoscopy (RPL) has been introduced to reduce the risks related to ports and abdominal wall trauma, with enhanced cosmetic outcomes (2). In this video, the authors report the case of a 59-year-old man with a small bowel neuroendocrine tumor, and who underwent a three-trocar right ileocolectomy.
Video: Preoperative work-up, including endoscopic ultrasound, octreoscan, PET-scan, and FDG PET-CT, showed a 15mm small bowel tumor with mesenteric and transverse mesocolic extension, until the muscularis propria of the third portion of the duodenum. The biopsy revealed a low-grade well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor. The procedure was performed using three abdominal trocars: a 12mm one in the umbilicus, a 5mm one in the right flank, and a 5mm port in the left flank (Figure 1). Abdominal cavity exploration demonstrated the presence of a tumor located in the mesentery of the last small bowel loop, with consequent bowel retraction, dislocation of the caecum and appendix, located under the right lobe of the liver, and tumoral extension into the proximal transverse mesocolon. After mobilization of the right colon from laterally to medially, the second and third duodenal segments were exposed, showing tumor extension towards the anterior duodenal wall of these segments. After encircling the anterior aspect of the duodenal wall with a piece of cotton tape (Figure 2), an endoscopic linear stapler was inserted through the umbilical trocar under the visual guidance of a 5mm scope in the left flank (Figure 3a), and it was fired (Figure 3b). The specimen was removed through a suprapubic access. Perioperative frozen section biopsy showed a free duodenal margin, and the procedure was subsequently completed with an ileocolic anastomosis, performed in a side-to-side handsewn intracorporeal fashion. At the end, the mesocolic defect was closed.

Results: Operative time was 4 hours. No added trocars were necessary. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 4. Pathological findings showed a grade I well-differentiated small bowel neuroendocrine tumor, with lymphovascular emboli and perinervous infiltration (1/20 metastatic nodes, free margins, stage: pT3N1 (8 UICC edition). A follow-up under somatostatin therapy was put forward.

Conclusions: RPL is a feasible option when performing advanced oncological surgery. Patients benefit from all MIS advantages, including reduced trocar complications and enhanced cosmetic outcomes.
Three-trocar laparoscopic right ileocolectomy for advanced small bowel neuroendocrine tumor
G Dapri
841 views
30 days ago
Surgical intervention
03:09
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy with a lumen-apposing metal stent
This video demonstrates a case of EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy, emblematic of the latest cutting-edge technology.
A 86-year-old woman with recent abdominal pain and jaundice underwent a CT-scan, which showed an enlarged tumor of the second portion of the duodenum with biliary tree dilatation. Gastroscopy with biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of duodenal adenocarcinoma of the 2nd duodenum.
First, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) failed to achieve biliary drainage because of an inability to cannulate the papilla due to tumor infiltration. EUS-guided hepatogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) was not attempted because the left intra-hepatic bile ducts were minimally dilated (3mm). However, the common bile duct (CBD) was largely dilated (20 mm). A Hot AXIOS™ Stent and Electrocautery Enhanced Delivery System (stent of 8 by 6mm) was advanced through the bulb. Pure cut electrocautery current was then applied, allowing the device to reach the CBD. Next, the distal flange was opened and retracted towards the EUS transducer, and once a biliary and bulbar tissue apposition had been noted, the proximal flange was released. Good drainage of purulent bile was observed and no complications occurred during the procedure and one month afterwards.
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy with a lumen-apposing metal stent
A Sportes
140 views
30 days ago
Surgical intervention
05:53
Transanal minimally invasive full-thickness middle rectum polyp resection with the patient in a prone position
Background: Nowadays, rectal preservation has gained popularity when it comes to the management of degenerated rectal polyps or early rectal cancer (1, 2). Tis/T1 rectal lesions can be safely treated without chemoradiation (3). Treatment via transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) offers more advantages than endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) (4). The authors report the case of a 60-year-old woman who underwent a TAMIS procedure for a large polyp located anteriorly in the middle rectum, which was 7cm away from the pectineal line and staged as uTisN0M0 preoperatively.
Video: The patient was placed in a prone position with a split-leg kneeling position. A reusable transanal D-Port (Karl Storz Endoskope, Tuttlingen, Germany) was introduced into the anus together with DAPRI monocurved instruments (Figure 1). The polyp was put in evidence (Figure 2) and resection margins were defined circumferentially using the monocurved coagulating hook. A full-thickness resection was performed with a complete removal of the rectal serosa and exposure of the peritoneal cavity, due to the anatomical polyp positioning (Figure 3). The rectal opening was subsequently closed using two converging full-thickness running sutures using 3/0 V-loc™ sutures (Figure 4a). The two sutures were started laterally and joined together medially (Figure 4b).
Results: Total operative time was 60 minutes whereas suturing time was 35 minutes. There was no perioperative bleeding. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged after 2 days. The pathological report showed a tubular adenoma with high-grade dysplasia and clear margins.
Conclusions: In the presence of degenerated rectal polyps, full-thickness TAMIS is oncologically safe and feasible. The final rectal flap can be safely closed by means of laparoscopic endoluminal sutures.
Transanal minimally invasive full-thickness middle rectum polyp resection with the patient in a prone position
G Dapri, S Mantoo
340 views
2 months ago

Frequently asked questions (FAQ)

  • I. Video content
    Which type of video can I send as a contribution to WebSurg?
    Videos of minimally invasive surgery should be scientifically relevant, and deal with one of the specialties which can be found on the website. They should put forward a surgical technique or a surgical instrument, and bring something new or interesting to the medical community. If you have a video of an operation or a technique you are proud of, share it with the rest of the world !
    Can I send a video presenting an unusual / controversial technique?
    After you have sent us your video, the peer-review committee will review it and you will receive a detailed response concerning the approval or the refusal of your video. We do have a section dedicated to “unusual / controversial cases”, which could correspond to your video. We are happy to receive contributions featuring uncommon and pioneering techniques.
    Can I send a video in which the face of the patient is visible?
    The face of the patient should be blurred in the video. The patient should not be identifiable in any other way, anything that could cause the identification of the patient on any part of the body should be blurred. If you cannot do it we can take care of this for you.
    Can I add animations and personalize my video (sound, colors, illustrations)?
    The video should not have any background music, it can include some explanations from the surgeon, and should be presented using a neutral background. Some colors and illustrations can be added as long as they don’t take the focus away from the content of the video. If you have animations which can illustrate your operation, you can insert them into the video.
  • II. Validation process
    Who validates my contribution?
    The peer-review committee is made up of qualified surgeons who are experts in their field. The committee is completely independent and is completely neutral when making decisions concerning contributions.
    Can I be sure that my video will be published?
    No, WebSurg aims to respect a certain number of criteria for the publication of videos, in order to maintain the quality of minimally invasive surgery content published on the website.
    How long does the validation process take?
    The validation process usually takes anywhere from 1 week to 1 month, depending on the availability of the committee’s members. In certain cases, it can take more than a month.
    What are the criteria upon which the validation process is based?
    Image quality
    Compliance with instructions
    Scientific and surgical relevance
    Compliance with medical principles (respect of patients, etc.)
    What happens after my video has been published?
    Once your video has been published, WebSurg mentions it in the monthly newsletter in order to communicate on our new contributions. You can also follow the evolution of your videos: comments, number of views, likes, shares, views depending on geographical location, etc.
    What can I do if my video is not accepted?
    A refusal does not mean that you cannot send more videos, making sure that WebSurg instructions are followed.
    Do WebSurg industrial partners play a role in the validation process?
    No our partners do not participate in the validation process in any way, and they are not part of the committee. The peer-review committee is made up of surgery experts in different fields, which accounts for a neutral decision-making process.
    Which video format is accepted by WebSurg?
    We accept a wide range of video formats: .mp4, .mov, .avi, 4K, etc.
    The perfect video: HD (1920x1080) .mp4 H264 VBR 10-20 Mb/s. Progressive 25-60 fps.
    Video we can accept: HD ready (1280x720). mp4 H264 VBR 5-10 Mb/s. Progressive 25-60 fps.
    Maximum quality we can manage: 4K (3840x2160). mp4 VBR 30-60 Mb/s. Progressive 25-60 fps.
    What is the maximum size for the video?
    A file of up to 20Gb can be sent using our form. However, if your video is larger in size, please contact us so that we can find a solution together.
  • III. Contributions and commercial brands
    Can I submit a video to advertize surgical instruments?
    WebSurg cannot be used as a commercial platform to advertize instruments. It can however be used to display new techniques, and new instruments – as long as the main focus of the video is the scientific relevance of the operation and/or of the use of the instrument.
    Can I send a video contribution if the logo of my surgical tools is visible?
    Yes, if the goal of the video is to display operative techniques. The video cannot simply be a commercial presentation of a product, of a company, etc.
    Can I send a video if the logo of my hospital or my company appears on the video?
    Yes, you can. However, it should not appear in the top right corner as this is where the IRCAD watermark appears in videos.
  • IV. Cost-related questions
    How much does a contribution to WebSurg cost?
    Publishing on WebSurg is completely FREE. It doesn’t cost anything and you will not receive a financial compensation for it. Find out more about the benefits of contributing to WebSurg.
    I don’t know how to edit the video, how much would the editing done by WebSurg cost?
    WebSurg can help you throughout the editing process entirely for free. Send us your operative videos, and we will help you perform the editing once our peer-review committee has validated the video.
    Can I sell the video that I have sent to WebSurg as a contribution?
    The raw footage that you send us belongs to you, which means that you can sell it or use it for other purposes. However the edited video which is published on WebSurg belongs to WebSurg. This means that it cannot be sold. You can still use this video for your communications, congresses, etc.